In Federalist number 10, Madison writes: It is desirable “to refine and enlarge the public views by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to the temporary or partial considerations.” The Framers, therefore, did not understand democracy as majority rule. Rather, they recognized the need to seek the “deliberate will of the people”. Explain why the American system of government cannot be described as a majoritarian democracy by exploring constitutional provisions that reflect the nature of the American political system.
America today is one of the leading countries when it comes to protection of human rights and freedoms. It is for this reason that the country has been baptized “The land of the free”. Through their constitution, human rights have been guaranteed and protected by the process of checks and balances. Additionally, it's worth mentioning that freedoms are also collective example being the freedom of press and assembly. Fundamentally, the American system cannot be described as majoritarian democracy as their voting process is determined by a clique of elites forming the electoral college and also by the fact that the minority rights are absolutely protected.
Consistent with its name, psychological social treatment (CBT) developed as a balanced amalgam of conduct and intellectual hypotheses of human conduct, causal and keeping up powers in psychopathology, and focuses for mediation (Kendall and Hollon, 1979). CBT was initially created to treat gloom, and has since been adjusted to the treatment of uneasiness issue, substance use issue, character issue, dietary issues, bipolar issue, and schizophrenia (Wenzel, A., Brown, G. K., and Karlin, B. E. (2011). CBT was created by Aaron Beck in the 1960's, this started with advancement that mixed the components of conduct treatment with psychological treatment. In this way, albeit social treatments and intellectual methodologies appeared to create in parallel ways, after some time the two methodologies converged into what is currently called subjective conduct treatment ( Milkman,H., Wanberg,K.(2007). It comes from the underlying methodology of Rational Emotive Therapy (RET). Suppositions of subjective conduct treatment were at first created by Albert Ellis in Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) and, at that point, later adjusted by Aaron Beck with Cognitive Therapy (CT) and Donald Meichenbaum with Cognitive Behavioral Modification.(CBM) (Spicer, A.2005).Within REBT is an order, convincing, and angry type of treatment in which the specialist satisfies the job of an educator. Customers have negative 'silly' contemplations when looked with an actuating occasion. When or if customers go up against these considerations and change them, the hypothesis is needed changes in practices/responses will pursue. Subjective treatment joins open finished inquiries to permit reflection, to address and resolve an individual's issues themselves.
The various techniques that include CBT mirror its intricate and integrative history. Following from early respondent molding speculations (Bandura, 1977), CBT consolidates ideas, for example, elimination and habituation. CBT proceeded to coordinate displaying and subjective rebuilding procedures from social learning and psychological speculations. What's more, center around self-talk and critical thinking are each obvious in CBT's general spotlight on encouraging the improvement of individual adapting techniques and authority of enthusiastic and subjective procedures. Reliable with a tripartite view (perception, conduct, feeling) of psychopathology (Barlow, 2000), CBT focuses on these various regions of weakness and roads of mediation.