Functional areas of HR

Question 1:

A) Select three functional areas of HR (i.e. recruiting, selection, training and development, compensation etc.) and, for each one, discuss how that function supports the HR and organizational strategy. Provide specific examples of goals and outcomes that support organizational success. B) Consider the organization you work for or one you have worked for in the past. Evaluate the effectiveness of the HR function overall and at least two specific functional areas (do not name the organization). Share at least one HR program or initiative that you found particularly effective and discuss how it supported the organization’s strategy. Why was it effective?

Question 2:
A) Identify two jobs you have held and share how you were recruited for each of them. Discuss in some detail, the organization’s perspective. What were some pros and cons of recruiting you through these methods? B) Evaluate your organization’s recruiting and selection processes. Be specific. How would you measure the effectiveness of these processes? Think in terms of reliability, validity, and legal compliance.

Question 3:
Some organizations follow a lengthy, complex selection process, whereas in other organizations the process may be more streamlined. Some may view the longer and more complex selection process to be more valid. A) What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a lengthier process versus a more streamlined one? Consider the perspectives of both the job seekers and the organization and the tradeoffs between
efficiency and effectiveness. As a job seeker, what process would you prefer to follow and why? B) Consider the selection process for an organization where you were ultimately hired. How would you describe the process from a candidate perspective? Do you believe it was effective? Why or why not? Question 4:

A) Why is retention such a major focus for human resource managers? How does focusing on retention add strategic value to the organization? B) How would you go about developing a retention program for your organization? Be specific in terms of what steps you would you take. What might be some of your biggest challenges? What type of metrics would you need to obtain and what methods would you use?

Sample Solution

opper further inspects the hypothesis of attractive energy by Einstein in Popper’s view; Einstein’s gravitational hypothesis is totally not quite the same as the above speculations. His hypothesis prompted the revelation that light is pulled in by overwhelming bodies correctly as material bodies are pulled in, and this can be affirmed by a photo taken throughout an obscuration. Popper additionally noticed that Einstein’s hypothesis had a lot of hazard in expectation since everybody before him would have expected a few outcomes incongruent with his hypothesis. In this way, the hypothesis was jumbled with some particular potential results of the perception, and if perceptions had indicated that the unanticipated impact was unquestionably missing, the hypothesis would have been discredited. In any case, this was affirmed by Eddington’s shroud perceptions in 1919 and affirmed to be a logical hypothesis.

The methodology put forth by Popper right now a deductive procedure, as showed by which specialists start with an issue, and thereafter, think about a speculative system to deal with the issue. Right now, suggestion is to emphatically surrender a system as observational or exploratory just in case it is prepared for being attempted by understanding. These examinations recommend that not the undeniable status but instead the falsifiability of a structure is to be taken as a model of the division. All things considered; he doesn’t expect of an insightful system that it may be fit for being singled out, once and for all, in a positive sense; yet its shrewd structure ought to be to such an extent that it very well may be singled out, by strategy for accurate tests, in a negative sense: there is the probability for a watched test structure to be discredited by understanding.

In his incredible work titled; Conjectures and Refutation: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge Popper cases that; science must rise up out of fantasies, and with the judgment of legends; neither with the get-together of observations, nor with the production of assessments anyway with the authentic conflict of legends, and of captivated procedures and practices. This can be viewed as progress as the new hypothesis will be nearer to reality than the bygone one.