The order of play tends to matter in sequential games where rivals must predict best reply-responses and counter-responses in order to achieve a desired payoff. Discuss an instance in which you or your firm used game theory and explain why the relationship between the players was a strategic one. Did the use of a credible threat or commitment affect the outcome? Was there any first mover of fast-second strategies used?
Scenario: Negotiating a Contract Renewal with a Freelancer
Imagine you’re a marketing manager for a company and need to renew the contract of a talented freelance writer. You value their work and want to keep them on board, but you also want to maintain your budget. This creates a strategic situation between you and the freelancer.
Game Theory Analysis:
Credible Commitment and First-Mover Advantage:
You, as the first mover, hold some initial advantage. Here’s how game theory concepts play a role:
Fast-Second Strategy:
The freelancer can employ a “fast-second” strategy by:
The Outcome:
Through open communication, a balance can be reached. Your credible commitment to a fair contract and the freelancer’s well-researched counter-offer can lead to a mutually beneficial outcome – both parties achieve their desired payoff.
Conclusion:
This scenario highlights the importance of game theory in understanding strategic interactions. By anticipating your opponent’s potential responses and using credible commitments, first-mover advantage, and well-informed counter-offers, both parties can achieve a win-win situation in a sequential game.