Genetically modified organism

at
Categories
Tags

Select an article about a genetically modified organism and write a summary of the article’s content in response to a set of questions.

Introduction

Write a research paper on a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) by selecting an article of your choice about a specific GMO.

Recombinant DNA technology is an area of much possibility, speculation, and controversy. The techniques used to cut out a piece of DNA from one organism and splice it into the DNA of another organism are rather simple now that scientists have discovered the tools to do it.

There are several things to keep in mind about biotechnology and recombinant DNA. One is to appreciate that for the process to work at all, there must be a common DNA language across species. Another is that the tools used for this process are, by and large, ones that already exist in nature. The human role in this is to use the various tools (enzymes) to cut and paste the fragments of DNA. You are invited to think about the possibilities that the technology opens up, and to understand why the field generates controversy.

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) are now commonly found in the food you eat and some medical applications. Your assessment involves researching a GMO to learn about the pros and cons of this organisms and how this might be impacting your life. You will examine how the organisms were modified with a new gene of interest and how microorganisms are used as tools for this process. You will also compare this information to other sources to determine any discrepancies in the information.​​

Search library or the Internet for an article from a reputable source and read about a specific genetically modified organism, such as one of the following (you are welcome to choose topics outside of this list):

Corn.
Potato.
Soy.
Dairy.
Cotton.
Canola oil.
Papaya.
Sugar.
Animal feed.
Salmon.
Golden rice.
Squash.
Sugar beets.
Potato.
Insulin.
Vaccines.
Growth hormones.
Follicle stimulating hormone.
Erythropoietin.
Instructions

Read the article and write a summary of its contents. Address all of the following in your summary:

What article did you read? Why did you choose this article?
What are the main points presented in the article?
What message is the author trying to communicate?
What is the gene of interest (being modified) and what is the purpose of this gene? Which organism is the gene inserted into, and what is the intended result of expressing this gene?
How are microorganisms that normally affect the immune system, such as bacteria or viruses, used beneficially as tools in biotechnology?
What are the pros and cons of this technology?
What do other sources of information say about the same concepts presented in the article? Are there discrepancies between the information in the article and that from other sources?
Where in your life (or in the life of a friend or family member) might the application of this form of biotechnology apply?
Your article should be from a reputable source and should meet all of the checklist items from Evaluating Sources.

Formatting Requirements
Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to APA style and formatting.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Length: 3-4 pages, in addition to a title page and references page.
Format: Submit the bioengineering paper and write a paragraph into your paper addressing the questions from the Evaluating Sources checklist.

Organization: You may wish to use these sections as a way to organize your paper:
Title page.
Review of article main points.
Gene of interest.
Microorganisms as tools.
Pros.
Cons
Comparison to other sources.
Conclusion.
References.

The acknowledgment of Whitney of all styles of contemporary American workmanship let it have an a lot more extensive scope of works with an increasingly diverse contribution. Mariners and Floozies don’t adhere to explicit measures of other contemporary arrangements, yet shows clear and expressive “enchantment pragmatist” style of Cadmus, as it frequently named.

The watcher’s eye is pulled in a counterclockwise development from the leaning back mariner, wearing his white dress, where Italian Renaissance craftsmanship firmly impacted Cadmus that thus took its lead from antiquated Greek and Roman workmanship through a marine who gets with a floozie and prizes him with a slap. Additional telling subtleties is the first page of the New York Daily News, which puts things in place in recorded point of view. Indeed, even wrinkled, it’s conceivable to see the substance of Mussolini on the first page of the paper.

Craftsmanship and homosexuality feel connected to us as indicated by Christopher Reed, as gay people and workmanship attested their personalities around a similar time, and in habits, which stressed their autonomy from every sort of sealed shut society. During the 1930s and 1940s, a ton of American craftsmen reacted to the World War II and Great Depression with brave photos of normal individuals in the Social Realist Style. Cadmus was just craftsman associated alongside this development who invested in archiving the encounters of gay individuals. Gay students of history have shown that WW2 was a critical defining moment, which offered open doors for men to feel and follow up on same-sex attractions. Be that as it may, this open minded condition changed drastically after the war, when the objective of the general public was come back to commonality simultaneously, a reestablished accentuation on family unit. Men who discovered their gay wants and had begun to make connections, structure connections and fight for their social equality found themselves arraigned and abused.

Like such a large number of his works, Sailor and Floozies restore a more established, practically medieval arrangement of ethical quality that the painter conjures to get an eyeful of a satiric eye on his peers. Cadmus delineates the prehistoric unethical behavior of ladies and men as a mind boggling congress of hookers and floozies from one perspective, and warriors and mariners on the other, every one of them assembled in Riverside Park.

Despite the fact that most of the allusion is hetero, you will discover insinuations of homosexuality as well. With certain special cases, the figures are clumsy and terrible. What most of moderns neglected to esteem was that this artful culmination of Cadmus a long way from being provocative in the method for contemporary workmanship was overpoweringly moderate. Irrefutably, it restored the old and conventional job of the comedian, who teaches his counterparts by summoning them to a beginning period of profound quality. Paul Cadmus stated “I am a humorist essentially,” and “Parody is the most clear medium I know to communicate my affection for society and my craving, through analysis, to improve it.”

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?