Genogram that identifies the racial or ethnic characteristics and changing worldviews of your family

is leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldn’t this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: ‘it is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’ In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether it’s lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For example: if soldiers want to execute all prisoners of war, they must do it for the right intention and for a just cause, proportional to the harm done to them. This is supported by Vittola: ‘not always lawful to execute all combatants…we must take account… scale of the injury inflicted by the enemy.’ This is further supported by Frowe approach, which

Sample Solution

My genogram reflects my family history, which is characterized by a variety of racial and cultural backgrounds. On my mother’s side, I am primarily of African American descent with some French ancestry as well. My father is a mix of German, Irish and Italian background. As one might imagine, growing up in this multicultural environment has had an immense influence on the way I identify myself today. When reflecting on my cultural heritage, I tend to focus mostly on the African American aspect because that is what I have been exposed to most throughout the course of my life. Although it may be easy for me to take for granted many aspects of this culture that are so intertwined in who I am today; things such as music, art or food - these aspects have all been passed down through generations and have contributed significantly to shaping my identity. Reflecting further upon my age, religious affiliation and socioeconomic status – these also play an important role in how I view myself within society. Being close in age with both my parents has instilled strong familial bonds within our household while attending church together over the years has taught us values such as compassion and empathy which we still live by today (Crocker et al., 2019). Growing up lower-mid class between two different families can make for difficult times but it also provided me with invaluable experiences working hard for what you want without compromising your moral compass (Yoon & Buehler 2020). Overall , when thinking about how I developed into who I am now - there’s no denying that race , culture , religion , income level etc all played some part . But more importantly than any demographic category – it’s the roots planted from generations before me combined with those around me today that truly contribute towards forming this unique identity known as myself.