HEALTH CARE DELIVERY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, OPERATIONS, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

at
Categories
Tags

 

H​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ealth Care Organization/Facility Identify the type and name of your non-profit organization. Organization Name: MAGNOLIA GARDEN PRIMARY CARE FACILITY Organization/Facility Mission: TO ADDRESS HEALTH DISPARITIES WITHIN MINORITY COMMUNITIES IN NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. Organization/Facility Vision Provide a substantial overview of your organization. Geographical location: NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. (This will piggy back off of the last case assignment you created for me) Health Care Delivery and Models Categorize the organization as an MCO or ACO. Provide a rationale for the categorization. Provide a comprehensive explanation of services offered by the organization/facility. Note: Services offered should meet the needs of the population identified and the dynamics of the organization/facility. Inpatient, outpatient, and/or ancillary services. Include E-Health Services. Prepare a map detailing the delivery of care (services) in the organization/facility. (See Burton, 2017, for a sample map.) Interpret and provide an explanation of the map you prepare. Information Systems Describe the systems used in the organization/facility that will manage health care data. How will information be collected, stored, and managed? Identify standards, policies, and security measures used. Include a plan of how this information will be disseminated throughout the organization to ensure all employees know all guidelines. Explain how the organization/facility will promote interoperability. Operations Management Construct and explain two simple organizational process maps that outline two quality processes that are important in healthcare operations management and assist with problem-solving and decision-making in your organization Develop two process maps to reflect inputs, outputs, and process steps in your organization. Be sure to utilize the correct symbols when developing your process map. Exhibit 6.6 identifies each symbol and reflects its use (pp. 140-150 of McLaughlin & Olson, 2017). Some example processes are activities in a clinic or hospital to measure wait time, utilization of resources, cause and effect, or development of an emergency plan. Visual examples are under exhibits 6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11. Please be creative and do not copy an example from the reading, but align your maps with your facility functions. Using the Operational Excellenc​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​e Scale provided by McLaughlin & Olson (2017, pp. 405-406), rationalize in detail the operational tools your organization/facility will use to be a “level 4” organization. Quality Assurance & Accreditation Rationalize specifically how the 6 domains of Health Care Quality (by the AHRQ) are fully addressed within the organization/facility. Create a detailed risk management and patient safety plan for the organization/facility. Each component should be broad and descriptive. The safety plan should be inclusive, but not limited to, the following components: Purpose Role of the Risk Manager Goal Include ongoing systematic approaches to achieve goals Scope Leadership Roles and Responsibilities at each level of the organization Oversight Safety Culture Reporting and identification of Harm Duty to Report Internal/External Reporting Identify and explain two leading methods of continuous quality improvement (Plan-Do-Study-Act, Rapid Cycle Improvement, FOCUS-PCDA, Lean, Six Sigma, and/or the FADE Model) that will be used in the organization/facility. Rationalize how the methods will be used to ensure that quality and safety are kept at/above the safety rating of major hospitals in the area of the organization/facility. You may use the following source to find the Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade for hospitals in your area: https://www.hospitalsafetygrade.org/ Assume the new organization/faciality is seeking Joint Commission (https://www.jointcommission.org/en/) accreditation. Identify and explain the major competencies this will require from management and staff. Conclusions and Recommendations Bring this section to a close and provide 2 or 3 recommendations for your organization based on the information researched and identified. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis. Case papers should be at least 5 pages, not including the title and reference pages. (At this point, you should have at least 10 pages; at least five pages for Module 1 and 5 pages for Module 2.) Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles with at least 5 references. (At this point, you should have at least 10 references, or at least 5 for Module 1 and 5 for Module 2.) Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: COMBO WITH 10 PPT SLIDES AND 7 SPEAKER ​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​NOTES

Sample Solution

Unique
In this task I plan to investigate how much moral contentions about the examination on Early stage foundational microorganisms (Esc’s) and actuated pluripotent undifferentiated cells (Ipsc’s) have changed throughout recent years and how factors, for example, leap forwards in research, financial and government association and broadening admittance to media have added to these changes. I expect to see 3 focuses over the most recent 20 years going from 2000 to the current day. I expect to figure out what these moral suppositions have meant for the advancement in undifferentiated cell research as far as how they are developed and reaped and furthermore as far as how before long its purposes are accessible to the majority. This venture will investigate how supported these feelings are when contrasted and the science behind it and whether there are cases that have been ignored which might have brought about an alternate result or on the other hand assuming there are contentions that can straightforwardly go against past ones.

Presentation
Immature microorganisms are undifferentiated cells that can be found in the undeveloped, fetal and grown-up phases of life which bring about the creation of separated cells that assume enormous parts in the development of tissue and organs. Three significant qualities of immature microorganisms incorporate the capacity to self fix its particular tissue or organ, its capacity to clone from a solitary cell [1] and its power, which empowers the cell to separate into various cell types. The strength of an immature microorganism decides the scope of which it can separate into various cells and tissue types. As a backhanded consequence of these discoveries, strength additionally decides the worth of undeveloped cells as far as examination purposes. The three principal positions of intensity beginning from the most powerful are: totipotent, pluripotent and multipotent undifferentiated organisms. Totipotent foundational microorganisms can separate into all human tissue types and possibly become a whole organic entity. They are extremely challenging to track down, nonetheless, as they must be tracked down in the beginning phases of preparation and the development of a zygote. It is so from the get-go as a matter of fact that they must be found in the span of 4 days of improvement [2 ]. Pluripotent immature microorganisms can frame each of the three microbe layers which permit them to likewise separate into any tissue type anyway they can not shape a living being.

Multi-powerful undifferentiated organisms are viewed as ready to separate into cells of a particular tissue type.

The discussion with respect to the examination on undifferentiated cells was provoked by declarations in 1998 [3] where Dr. James Thomson had the option to disconnect human undeveloped foundational microorganisms and where Dr. John Gearhart detached human undeveloped microbe cells. The immature microorganisms that would be gathered from the sources expressed are pluripotent. Along these lines, researchers accepted that undifferentiated cell exploration will ultimately lead treatments to help treat; stroke, diabetes, Alzheimers and a large group of as of now degenerative and serious sicknesses. Anyway in light of the fact that these early stage undifferentiated organisms couldn’t be collected without obliterating incipient organisms, this caused numerous moral and strict protests. This then, at that point, caused president Clinton in 1999 to require the Public Bioethics Warning Commission (NBAC) to hold formal conferences in regards to the issues raised from immature microorganism research. Following these hearings, a far reaching report was distributed. The report covered; logical, legitimate, moral, strict and public arrangement viewpoints on immature microorganism research. These reports lead to the presentation of a subsidizing strategy for immature microorganism research that would stay close by for a long time to come, with the central matter being that researchers should not make or obliterate incipient organisms that aren’t in overabundance to explore undeveloped cells.

Examination into undifferentiated cell has gotten a lot of worldwide interest because of its capability to change the existences of victims of different illnesses in the future radically. In view of this, it would be most likely correct that individuals and states would be in support of the utilization of immature microorganisms, but once gave the way that specific undifferentiated organisms expect incipient organisms to be annihilated for instance it brings up individuals to doubt assuming the expense merits the possible result of the exploration. The fundamental inquiry I wish to address investigates the degree where moral assessments have been affected by logical progressions in research, yet additionally

This question has been answered.

Get Answer