Healthcare Compliance

at
Categories
Tags

Explore compliance issues with federal and state laws and regulations governing healthcare organizations, such as the Anti-Kickback Law, the False Claims Act, the Stark Law, credentialing, medical errors, and patient safety. It is important to understand healthcare compliance for the benefit of improving patient care. It is also important to promote adherence to applicable laws, payer healthcare requirements, and to protect the organization against fraud, waste, abuse, and other potential liabilities.

Instructions
Write a 2–3 page paper in which you:

Summarize one statute, one regulation, and one guidance document that impose compliance obligations on healthcare organizations.
Explain what healthcare organizations must do to comply with legal requirements.
Describe the standards for corporate compliance programs set forth in the OIG Compliance Guidance and the Federal Register.
In addition to the textbook, provide two sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and valid. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library, or review library guides.

Sample Solution

Many firms are attempting to develop a successful compliance program in these times of increased regulatory enforcement. Understanding what compliance actually is and how it is defined should be each organization’s first step. For a better understanding of health care compliance, organizations may want to take into account the following terminology and background information: The continual process of fulfilling or exceeding the legal, moral, and professional standards that are relevant to a certain healthcare institution or provider is known as healthcare compliance. Through its compliance guidance publications, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has contributed to the definition of healthcare compliance.

of adequate quality and should be achievable. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (from now on alluded to as CESCR) has obviously characterized that concerning the availability of water, it should be made accessible sans separation as well as financially and truly achievable.

Concerning oppression the availability to water, General Comment No 15 has explicitly expressed that all water amneties as well as administrations should be made achievable to all people, particularly to the “most defenseless or underestimated areas of the poppulation” with severe preclusion on separation. Besides, Contracting States owe an obligation to its residents for the counteraction any unfair treatment on all universally restricted warrant in measures connecting with water and its ministrations.

In its endeavor to clarify the right to wellbeing, the CESCR expected a homogenous meaning of the term openness by legitimizing that a causal component of wellbeing like consumable water, is expected to be available to all people, dominatingly for “the most defenseless or underestimated segments of the populace [… ] inside safe actual reach for all areas of the populace [and] reasonable for all.” Mr. Paul Hunt makes sense of that for the full delight in the most elevated available level of physical and emotional well-being, there should be made accessible all essential causal components connected with wellbeing including wellbeing conveniences, items as well as offices.

By talking about the relations of water to one side to wellbeing, it should be featured that physcial attainable quality requires that “water, and satisfactory water offices and administrations, should be inside safe actual reach for all areas of the poppulation” . Water that is harmless in nature, satisfactory and adequate should be reachable inside or in quick closeness of “every family, instructive establishment and working environment”.

Based on monetary feasibility, it is fundamental that that admittance to arrangements for water and its administrations should be made sensibly valued for all. The CESCR has plainly portrayed that any settlement for water administrations should be on the premise on “the guideline of value”, with the assurance that the said administrations, whether it be public or secretly outfitted, should be made financially acessible to all with the consideration of “socially hindered gatherings”. Moreover, the CESCR proceeded to indicate that “the immediate and roundabout expenses and accuses related of getting water should be reasonable, and should not think twice about compromise the

This question has been answered.

Get Answer