A county health department wants to increase the number of Medicaid beneficiaries that participate in prenatal care. It knows that only 40 percent of the expectant mothers eligible for prenatal care fully use the benefit. Many of these target customers make only one or two prenatal visits and then drop out of the program. Most of these women visit the emergency room if they have problems during pregnancy, and also come to the emergency room when they are in labor. For a clear and effective strategy include the following points;
Define at least four questions you would need to ask in order to write a SWOT analysis.
Write vision and mission statements for the county health department that provides services to pregnant women.
Write at least four objectives for the department. In your objectives, try to address the problem presented in the scenario.
overlays and the use of electronic reading pens. One important effect of the EA is the requirement for schools to ‘advance equality of opportunity’ between pupils with disabilities and their non-disabled peers. Reasonable adjustments can be a good way of addressing this issue.
The duty of an educational institution is to determine whether their provision places a disabled student at a major disadvantage in contrast with non-disabled students. A major or a substantial disadvantage is explained in the Equality Act as one that is more than inconsequential or minor. As a result, the main objective of the duty is not to confer an inequitable advantage on disabled students, but to eliminate barriers to learning, where it is reasonable to do so. The duty imposed on an educational institution (herein after referred as EI) is anticipatory and the EI should not wait until adjustments are suggested, but to make sure, wherever possible, that adjustments or alterations to policies, procedures and practices have been made in advance to stop disabled students being at a major disadvantage. No legal defence is available for an EI for its failure to make a reasonable adjustment, and it would be regarded as discrimination under section 21 of the EA 2010.