Hinduism and Buddhism

 

 

 

“should the mother be allowed to make the medical decisions for her son”. Focus on the mother, the son, and use the principles of Autonomy and Ethical Egoism. Use the religion of christianity and the moral theory of duty-based ethics.

This course requires students to complete a 4-5 page paper. This paper answers an
ethics question using one specific religion’s moral approach.
Students will choose one of the religions we study:
• Hinduism
• Buddhism
• Judaism
• Christianity
• Islam
….and one of the moral theories we are learning:
• Duty-based ethics (deontology)
• One moral principle of teleological principlism
• Casuistry
• Virtue ethics
• Social ethics
The paper answers an ethics question in the way that one religion’s moral traditions
might answer it, using one of these moral theories. In this paper, students will
demonstrate how a specific moral approach, used in one of the three religions we are
covering, would ethically analyze an ethics case, and then answer the ethics question.
The main thesis statement of the paper is an answer to the ethics question. The paper’s
main argument explains why the question would be answered in this way, in a specific
religion and using a specific moral theory. In other words, the paper demonstrates the
reasoning that might be used by someone thinking in terms of the religion and using
that moral approach.
The paper’s outline should follow a plan like this:
• Introduce the paper and state the thesis: this will note the religion and the
approach, might also include some teaser-reflection about the ethics question the
paper discusses. (1/2 page at the most)
• Describe the case, name the moral agent, present the ethics question. (1 to 1 &
1/2 pages at the most)
Background of the religion: In this section the paper will introduce the religion the
paper is using in way that prepares the reader to follow the paper’s main point.
This might include the religion’s moral tradition(s), some of its history, a
description of one of the practices done in the religion or of a symbol employed in
the religion. This section should be both accurate and relevant to the moral theory section of the paper. (About 3/4 of a page)
• Explain the moral theory: In this section the paper names and briefly describes
the moral approach the paper will use to answer the ethics question. This might
or might not include a reference to the religion. (About 3/4 of a page)
• Ethical analysis: This is the paper’s main point. In this section the paper gives the

Sample Solution

From all the specifications of the risk-taking construct reviewed so far, we can state that risk taking is not an isolated construct but is closely related to other fundamental learner variables such as classroom participation and willingness to communicate in a second language. What should be highlighted from the literature on risk taking is that this term requires interplay between the learner and the decisions that he makes, his willingness to participate, and the educational setting.

Definitely the definitions of risk taking have also caused research to account for the particular traits that a risk taker should have. In regard to the requirements that learners have to meet in order to be assumed risk takers, one of the most powerful reports corresponds to Ely’s dimensions. According to Ely’s (as cited in Alshalabi, 2003) first dimension, risk takers are not suspicious about utilizing a newly encountered linguistic component. The second dimension refers to risk takers’ willingness to use linguistic components perceived to be complicated or difficult. According to Alshalabi (2003) this dimension clarifies why risk takers expand levels of tolerance towards vagueness and ambiguity to the extent in which a complex or new situation does not really demonstrate an issue of concern for them. The third and fourth dimensions explain respectively how risk takers become tolerant toward possible incorrectness or inaccuracy in utilizing the language and how they are inclined to rehearse a new component silently before attempting to use it aloud. Hongwei (1996) mentions that this rehearsal issue, nevertheless, is further discussed by other\g researchers who believe that prior preparedness before producing utterances may hamper risk taking. Indeed, mental preparedness is said to be a specification of more cautious students who on special opportunities spend so much time preparing to talk that they decide not to take the risk of speaking in front of others.

Risk Taking should be a central issue in foreign Language learning particularly with respect to speaking exercises. As indicated by Beebe (1983) “you take a risk every time you open your mouth in a foreign Language, or for that matter in any learning situation where you are called on to perf

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.