Hitler Asked You To Electrocute a Stranger
Read the article Meyer: "If' Hitler Asked You To Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably" p.71
a) Briefly explain this experiment, focusing on the different roles and what happened.
b) Why didn’t Milgram ever take his experment to Germany, even though he had originally planned to? Explain
c) What forces are at work in social situations like this which lead the individual to do things that he or she might not normally do? Explain.
d) "What happened in Nazi Germany could never happen here in America, we are after all a democratic society, and Germany was undemocratic, even autocratic." Respond to this statement.
understudies. Given the expected worth of such figures propelling scholastic achievement and hence impacting results like maintenance, wearing down, and graduation rates, research is justified as it might give understanding into non-mental techniques that could be of possible benefit to this populace (Lamm, 2000) . Part I: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Introduction The country is encountering a basic lack of medical care suppliers, a deficiency that is supposed to increment in the following five years, similarly as the biggest populace in our country's set of experiences arrives at the age when expanded clinical consideration is essential (Pike, 2002). Staffing of emergency clinics, centers, and nursing homes is more basic than any time in recent memory as the enormous quantities of 'people born after WW2's start to understand the requirement for more continuous clinical mediation and long haul care. Interest in turning into a medical caretaker has disappeared as of late, presumably because of the historical bac
Sample Solution
The experiment outlined in Meyer’s article “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably” (1973) was originally designed by Stanley Milgram and seeks to explore the extent of obedience among individuals when ordered to do something they believe is wrong. The experiment begins with two participants—the teacher and the learner—who are randomly assigned roles. The teacher is asked by an authoritative figure—the experimenter—to administer electric shocks to the learner if he gets any questions wrong during a learning task. With every wrong answer, the voltage of the shock increases and causes increasing distress for both parties involved.
Milgram sought to carry out this study on German soil in order to ascertain whether or not Germans living at that time had become desensitized from following orders from an authoritarian leader like Hitler; however, it is noted that he never did so due to ethical qualms. It seemed too risky for him as a researcher who was Jewish himself given what had happened in Germany only decades before his test was conducted. Furthermore, although this was intended as a scientific study about obedience rather than a moral critique about Nazism itself, there may have been fear of political repercussions associated with conducting such research close to where these events transpired as well as possible echoes from Nazi pseudoscience experiments themselves which could potentially taint his research results.