Homeostasis

 

 

 

 

1. Describe your understanding of the homeostasis process by summarizing how the food you have (or have not) eaten today affects your blood glucose level.

Provide answer here

2. Summarize the function of four organelles found in a basic human cell.

Provide answer here

3. Describe how substances move in and out of a cell.

Provide answer here

4. Choose two organs that are found in different body cavities. Describe their location in relation to each other, using at least three positional medical terms.

Sample Solution

The human organism consists of trillions of cells working together for the maintenance of the entire organism. While cells may perform very different functions, the cells are quite similar in their metabolic requirements. Maintaining a constant internal environment with everything that the cells need to survive (oxygen, glucose, mineral ions, waste removal, etc.) is necessary for the well-being of individual cells and the well-being of the entire body. The varied processes by which the body regulates its internal environment are collectively referred to as homeostasis. The homeostasis process refers to the body’s ability to regulate its internal environment and maintain a stable state. The food you have eaten today affects your blood glucose level by providing the body with energy. If you have not eaten enough food, your blood glucose level will drop and you will feel tired.

The second section begins deciphering jus in bello or what actions can we classify as permissible in just wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323).
First, it is never just to intentionally kill innocent people in wars, supported by Vittola’s first proposition. This is widely accepted as ‘all people have a right not to be killed’ and if a soldier does, they have violated that right and lost their right. This is further supported by “non-combatant immunity” (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which leads to the question of combatant qualification mentioned later in the essay. This is corroborated by the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, ending the Second World War, where millions were intently killed, just to secure the aim of war. However, sometimes civilians are accidentally killed through wars to achieve their goal of peace and security. This is supported by Vittola, who implies proportionality again to justify action: ‘care must be taken where evil doesn’t outweigh the possible benefits (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).’ This is further supported by Frowe who explains it is lawful to unintentionally kill, whenever the combatant has full knowledge of his actions and seeks to complete his aim, but it would come at a cost. However, this does not hide the fact the unintended still killed innocent people, showing immorality in

This question has been answered.

Get Answer