How OCD affects daily lives
This section has both an introduction (little bit about yourself, why you picked your topic... etc) and contains the literature review. Basically, in a literature review, you′re summarizing what you learned from all the sources you looked up. This is the section of the paper where you essentially say “this is what’s already out there.” You should take 5-6 pages to summarize the literature that’s already out there and remember to summarize IN YOUR OWN WORDS, also. After you′ve summarized what you learned from the literature, then you talk about what still needs to be done (perhaps with your topic they′ve done MRI studies but they haven′t done fMRI studies) and you then propose why your study would help fill in any gaps (.5-1 page).
Methods & Results (3-4 pages): This part has multiple sections and should be written in first person and in past tense as if you actually did the research already (even though again, YOU′RE NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO DO THIS STUDY):
1. Participants-How many participants were involved in the study? What were their relevant characteristics (age, gender, race, etc.)? How were they recruited? If they′re animals how were they be cared for? Provide additional information for clarity.
2. Materials-What materials or instruments were used in the experiment? What ingredients were needed to run your study (tests, gadgets, specific technology, etc.)? This is where you will include various biopsychology methods and how they were used (again, pretending that you actually completed the study)
3. Design-Explain the design of the experiment and why that was the best design for your study (might be an experimental study or observational study... etc). Provide a clear desсrіption of all procedures that were followed in the study. What were the groups? Was there a manipulation to controlled variables? Provide the steps of the study in chronological order for the reader.
4. Results- Write a paragraph or two about what the results of your study were. These will be hypothetical results but you will still write them in past tense as if you actually did the study.
Discussion (2-4 pages): In this section you are reflecting on different aspects of the research, as if you actually did it! This will also be written in past tense as if you completed the study! Include the following:
1. Elaborate on your findings, did you find significant results? What does that mean? Did you find non-significant results? What does that mean?
2. Discuss how your study followed APA ethical guidelines by discussing the use of an informed consent form, debriefing statement, deception, and obtaining IRB permission.
3. Discuss any limitations in your study (e.g., possible confounding, lack of random assignment or random sampling, etc.)
4. Conclude with a discussion of future studies that could arise from your study
Sample Solution
The scholarly articles on evidence of Jesus as a Jew provide varying perspectives regarding his identity and cultural background. Natalija Novaković’s “Jesus as a Jew in Paul’s Epistles” (2012) presents that Jesus must be viewed through a Hebrew lens rather than exclusively outside influences since so much evidence exists linking him directly back to local Judaic culture both tangible historical accounts beyond mere conjecture (Novakovic 2012). Mark Nanos argues in “An Enigmatic Figure: A Test Case For Being Non-Jewishly Identified As A Jew In Antiquity” (2011) that Josephus\' writings show Christianity being deeply intertwined with Judaism during its formative years due to their shared religious customs and values (Nanos 2011). Moreover, Esther Chazon's research suggests exploring the significance of location when assessing Jesus of Nazareth\'s identity which can be done by looking at activities like fishing which would have defined life along Lake Kinneret coupled with various religious practices which shaped local communities like those found in Sepphoris or Capernaum will yield much more information regarding what specifically made up Jesus\' Judaism than examining just external sources such as Evangelists might imply.(Chazown 2008) All three authors concur that it is undeniable despite differing opinions concerning finer details,that Jesus was indeed a Jew and provide valuable insight into his cultural background.(Novakovic 2012;Nanos 2011;Chazown 2008)ools of economic thought
1. Keynesian Economics: This is an economic school of thought developed by British economist John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s. It focuses on the role of aggregate demand in determining output and employment levels, advocating active fiscal and monetary policies to achieve full employment and price stability. The core ideas involve using government spending, taxation, and other strategies to manage the economy.
2. Classical Economics: This is an economic school of thought that was popular during the 18th and 19th centuries. It focused on Say's Law which states that production leads to consumption; supply creates its own demand as long as prices are flexible enough for market forces to adjust them accordingly. Classical economics also emphasized free markets and laissez-faire policies, believing that if left alone they would tend towards equilibrium or full employment automatically without any government intervention or distortion from external forces such as monopolies or cartels.
3. Austrian Economics: This is a school of economic thought with roots dating back to Carl Menger’s work in 1870 which focused on understanding how individual choices shape incentives within a free market setting, emphasizing entrepreneurship and competition among small businesses as key drivers of growth over larger corporate entities supported by government regulation or subsidies. Austrian economists also believe in stressing private property rights for individuals along with limited state interference into economic activity so that entrepreneurs can exercise their judgment freely at their own risk without fear of retribution from outside powers such as governments or banks.
ical framework to another. Casting a ballot in decisions, supporting ideological groups through monetary commitments, assisting in the political mission, connecting with the chosen authorities to offer a viewpoint or to voice out a complaint, and partaking in the exercises of neutral associations coordinated towards some open reason are the signs of people groups' conduct in the political circle, which he considered as political cooperation.
To lessen the dubiousness of the expression "political cooperation, Gunter (1991) orders it into two significant sorts: the popular\conventional and whimsical types of political investment. The famous sorts of political support assumes little private inclusion. The models incorporate democratic and dispersal of political data. Then again, unpredictable types of political investment surmises individual inclusion and commitment, as effectively drew in for an ideological group or development, campaigning for political position, or political dissent exercises. Obviously, he separates the two significant kinds of political cooperation fundamentally founded on the level of commitment and\or contribution of the residents in the political circle. Besides, Vinod and Deshpanded (2013) underline that political portrayal and support upgrade authenticity by furnishing residents with a feeling of individual worth and a consolation that their voice is esteemed. However expanded interest may not be guaranteed to prompt more helpful political results, yet deficient resident association and cooperation can and influences the validity and authenticity of the political framework.
The Philippines as unitary in its type of government, the Filipinos partake by different routes in the political circle. As needs be, concentrates on in political support have dominatingly zeroed in on the experience of political contribution through coordinated gatherings, discretionary way of behaving including casting a ballot, and ladies' political cooperation explicitly their endeavors to sort out as a political power at the neighborhood level and to campaign a public service position. (Montiel and Macapagal, 2000)
As per the review Francisco on Ladies' Support and Backing in the Party-list political race in 1998, the discoveries of his review show a huge piece of its populace doesn't connect politically through such roads and that nearly everybody will, at some point, actually partake politically as a person. The hidden purposes behind this is that certain individuals don't take part even in races essentially on the grounds that they don't have the trust to the running up-and-comers or to the public authority itself. For the Philippines, emergi