When the crisis first broke out, how should NECC and its management first react?
When a company, especially a small one like NECC, gets into trouble, plaintiff’s attorneys start looking for other defendants. Who is vulnerable to a civil lawsuit?
Who and what helps keep corporate misbehavior in check when the law fails? Why did it take so long for NECC and Ameridose to get caught?
What is whistleblowing and what its advantages and disadvantages (a) generally and (b) specifically in the case of NECC?
Should bankruptcy be considered? What entities or individuals should consider bankruptcy as an option? What happens to an injured plaintiff’s claims when a defendant files bankruptcy? Is filing for bankruptcy an effective way to avoid lawsuits, claims or liability?
Initial Reaction:
When the crisis first broke out, NECC’s management should have prioritized the following actions:
Potential Defendants:
In a situation like NECC’s, several parties might be vulnerable to lawsuits:
Checks and Balances:
Several entities help keep corporate misbehavior in check, even when the law seems slow to react:
The delay in catching NECC could be attributed to:
Whistleblowing:
Generally:
Specifically in the Case of NECC:
Bankruptcy:
Bankruptcy might be considered as a last resort:
Impact on Lawsuits:
Filing for bankruptcy isn’t a guaranteed escape from lawsuits. It can be a complex process with legal and financial implications. While it might provide temporary relief from lawsuits, it doesn’t eliminate the underlying legal issues.