Contrast the Humanistic and Existential perspectives as they pertain to the concept of personality. Which philosophical assumptions were most important to Rogers?
Using the Existential framework, how do times of change and crisis lead us to reconsider our values?
The Humanistic and Existential perspectives offer distinct views on personality, each rooted in different philosophical assumptions.
Humanistic Perspective
Existential Perspective
Comparison
While both perspectives emphasize the importance of individual experience and personal growth, they differ in their underlying assumptions and focus. Humanistic psychology is more optimistic, emphasizing the potential for positive development and the role of supportive relationships. Existential psychology is more grounded in the realities of human existence, acknowledging the challenges and anxieties of life.
Rogers’ Philosophical Assumptions
Carl Rogers, a prominent humanistic psychologist, emphasized the following philosophical assumptions:
Existentialism and Times of Change and Crisis
Existentialism highlights the role of change and crisis in shaping our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world. When faced with significant life events such as loss, illness, or major transitions, individuals may be forced to re-evaluate their values and priorities. These experiences can lead to a deeper understanding of oneself and a renewed sense of purpose.
In conclusion, both the Humanistic and Existential perspectives offer valuable insights into the nature of personality and the human experience. While they differ in their underlying assumptions, both perspectives emphasize the importance of individual choice, self-awareness, and personal growth.