Identification of the fraud suspect

  Answer the following question in detail. Some have argued that while pressure and opportunity can be ascertained about the subject, how useful is rationalization as an indicator leading to the identification of the fraud suspect? You must include a minimum of 4 scholarly peer reviewed articles, not textbooks or books, as in-text citations within your response to this question. Your response to this question should be a minimum of two pages using WORD document format and in APA, with references at the end of your response. It does NOT have to be mailed, only posted in Canvas.  
understudies. Given the expected worth of such figures propelling scholastic achievement and hence impacting results like maintenance, wearing down, and graduation rates, research is justified as it might give understanding into non-mental techniques that could be of possible benefit to this populace (Lamm, 2000) . Part I: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Introduction The country is encountering a basic lack of medical care suppliers, a deficiency that is supposed to increment in the following five years, similarly as the biggest populace in our country's set of experiences arrives at the age when expanded clinical consideration is essential (Pike, 2002). Staffing of emergency clinics, centers, and nursing homes is more basic than any time in recent memory as the enormous quantities of 'people born after WW2's start to understand the requirement for more continuous clinical mediation and long haul care. Interest in turning into a medical caretaker has disappeared as of late, presumably because of the historical bac

Sample Solution

The well-known fraud triangle framework includes three distinct components—perceived pressures, perceived opportunities, and rationalizations—but until recently very little was known about perpetrators’ rationalizations. An awareness of rationalization techniques can advance an organization beyond the checklist mentality that sometimes results in the instinctive temptation to merely check the box. Combining this knowledge with the directives under COSO can turn the fraud triangle into a multifaceted armor against fraud. How can anyone comprehend the reasoning of a fraudster? Research shows that individuals who behave unethically usually experience guilt and discomfort before committing the deviant act, and that they try to reduce this guilt and discomfort through rationalization. By understanding the common techniques for rationalization, organizations can design antifraud programs to make rationalization harder and, as a result, make it more challenging for potential fraudsters to commit fraud.

Comply today with Compliantpapers.com, at affordable rates

Order Now