Imagine yourself as the CIO of an engineering and software development company

 

 

Imagine yourself as the CIO of an engineering and software development company that has federal, military, and civilian customers. You must ensure that all your company’s information, as well as data exchanged with your customers, is properly encrypted using known, accepted standards.

 

Select the encryption component from a major standard, such as NIST, ANSI, IEEE, IETF, or ISO, for your company.

Describe the encryption component of the standard, its pros and cons, and justify your selection.

Discuss whether you would communicate with your customers using an asymmetric or symmetric algorithm, and why, and rationalize the type of algorithm you would use, such as RSA or DES.

After reading a few of your classmate’s postings, reply to those from which you learned something new or to which you have something constructive to add. For example:

 

Discuss what you learned.

Ask probing questions or seek clarification.

Explain why you agree or disagree with your classmate’s main points, assertions, assumptions, or conclusions.

Suggest research strategies or specific resources on the topic.

Sample Solution

As CIO of an engineering and software development company serving federal, military, and civilian customers, ensuring robust and compliant encryption for all data, both internal and exchanged with clients, is paramount. Given the sensitive nature of operations for these customers, adherence to established, internationally recognized standards is not just a best practice, but a mandatory requirement for maintaining trust and securing contracts.

Selected Encryption Component and Justification

For our company, I would select the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) as the primary encryption component, as defined and specified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in FIPS Publication 197.

Description of AES (NIST FIPS 197):

AES is a symmetric-key block cipher adopted by the U.S. government to protect classified information. It operates on fixed-size blocks of data (128 bits) and uses key sizes of 128, 192, or 256 bits. Unlike its predecessor DES, AES is not based on a Feistel network but rather a substitution-permutation network. This means it performs a series of transformations on the data block, including byte substitution, shifting rows, mixing columns, and adding round keys. The number of rounds depends on the key size (10 rounds for 128-bit keys, 12 for 192-bit keys, and 14 for 256-bit keys).

Pros of AES:

  1. Strength and Security: AES is considered highly secure and has withstood extensive cryptanalysis. No practical attacks have been found against the full AES cipher (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001). Its larger key sizes offer strong resistance against brute-force attacks, making AES-256 the preferred choice for highly sensitive data.
  2. Government Standard: As a FIPS-approved standard, AES is mandated for use by U.S. government agencies for protecting sensitive but unclassified information, and also for classified information up to the Top Secret level with AES-256 (National Security Agency, n.d.). This directly addresses our company’s federal and military customer requirements.
  3. Performance: Despite its strength, AES is computationally efficient and performs well across various hardware and software platforms. This makes it suitable for high-volume data exchange and real-time operations, which is crucial for an engineering and software development company. Modern CPUs often have hardware acceleration for AES, further enhancing its speed.
  4. Widespread Adoption and Interoperability: AES is globally recognized and widely adopted in commercial products and protocols (e.g., SSL/TLS, VPNs, Wi-Fi WPA2/WPA3, disk encryption). This ensures interoperability with our customers’ existing systems and reduces integration complexities.
  5. Algorithmic Transparency: The AES algorithm is public and was developed through an open, transparent competition, fostering confidence in its security.

Cons of AES:

  1. Key Management: As a symmetric algorithm, AES requires both the sender and receiver to possess the same secret key. Securely exchanging and managing these keys can be challenging, especially in large-scale environments or with multiple distinct customers. This necessitates robust key exchange protocols and infrastructure.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.