Inappropriate nursing interventions

 

Read the two case summaries provided here http://www.nursinglaw.com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/january2013/january2013.pdf. The case summaries are on page 2. Once you read the two case summaries, follow the instructions below.
Compare the appropriate nursing interventions by the nurse completed in Mississippi to the inappropriate nursing interventions by the nurse in the Texas case. Provide rationale supporting your comparison citing at least two scholarly sources.

 

Sample Solution

In the Mississippi case, the nurse appropriately followed protocol in identifying and addressing a potential safety issue. The nurse identified that a patient was not adequately hydrated, as evidenced by his “low urine output.” After assessing the patient and recognizing signs of dehydration, the nurse then notified the physician (who ordered additional IV fluids) and provided nursing interventions to ensure proper hydration through monitoring and documenting intake/output ratios. This intervention was in accordance with accepted standards of practice for nurses (Kozier & Erb, 2017).

In contrast, the Texas nurse engaged in inappropriate medical practices thus resulting in disciplinary action from the Board of Nursing. Specifically, this nurse prescribed medication without authorization from a provider which is considered an act outside their scope of practice (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2015). Not only did this action violate professional standards but it also put patients at risk by potentially leading to incorrect or unsafe medication administration practices.

Both cases demonstrate how nurses must adhere to recognized standards of practice for providing safe care for their patients. In order to properly protect those under their care, nurses must follow established protocols regarding diagnosis, communication with other healthcare providers, management of medications and implementation of necessary interventions (Bryant & Bailey 2019). Doing so ensures that proper procedures are being followed when caring for any patient regardless if they are located within Mississippi or Texas.

at times supplanted by a quick n-bit convey spread viper. A n by n exhibit multiplier requires n2 AND doors, n half adders, and n2 , 2n full adders. The Variable Correction Truncated Multiplication technique gives a proficient strategy to re-ducing the power dissemination and equipment necessities of adjusted exhibit multipliers. With this strategy, the diagonals that produce the t = n , k least critical item pieces are disposed of. To make up for this, the AND doors that create the halfway items for section t , 1 are utilized as contributions to the changed adders in segment t. Since the k excess changed full adders on the right-hand-side of the cluster don’t have to create item bits, they are supplanted by adjusted decreased full adders (RFAs), which produce a convey, yet don’t deliver a total. To add the consistent that revises for adjusting mistake, k , 1 of the MHAs in the second column of the exhibit are changed to altered concentrated half adders (SHAs). SHAs are identical to MFAs that have an informat

This question has been answered.

Get Answer