This project will help you to understand the factors, decisions, and ethics that influence the performance of multinational corporations (MNCs) and foreign stocks in the international financial environment. This project will be completed throughout the course in Units II, IV, VI, and VIII.In this unit, you will create a stock portfolio of at least three U.S.-based MNCs and two foreign stocks. You will monitor the performance of the portfolio during the course. In Unit VIII, you will attempt to explain why each stock increased or decreased in price and why your portfolio performed well or poorly. Your explanations should offer insight into what is driving the valuations of the companies.To review possible stocks to include in your portfolio, you can use any finance website, such as the Yahoo! Finance website. Make sure the MNCs you select conduct a considerable amount of business in the international environment.To review possible foreign stocks that are traded on the U.S. stock exchanges, you can use the J.P. Morgan website. American depository receipts (ADRs) are securities that represent ownership in foreign stock. ADRs are denominated in dollars but reflect the value of a foreign stock. This means that changes to the value of the foreign currency can increase or decrease the value of the ADRs. Click on the company listed in the DR Directory on the J.P. Morgan website to review information about each company.For this assignment, create a spreadsheet with 5 rows and 7 columns, which you will use to track your investment. Assume that you will invest $10,000 in each stock purchased. The spreadsheet will include the following components:
firm name;
ticker symbol;
amount of investment in each stock ($10,000 per stock for a total of $50,000);
price per share at which you purchased the stock;
exchange rate;
percentage change in stock price, which will be updated in Units IV, VI, and VIII; and
change analysis, which will identify the primary reason for the change in stock price. (Leave this column blank for this unit, as this column will be updated in Units IV, VI, and VIII.)
Use the following column titles in your spreadsheet.
Firm Name
Ticker Symbol
Investment Amount
Purchase Price Per Share
Exchange Rate
Percentage Change
Change Analysis
Include the name of the stock, ticker symbol, primary goods or services, and foreign market of operation.
Summarize the management environment of the companies, and discuss the companies’ contributions to international trade flows.
Briefly discuss any critical relationships pertaining to the foreign currency exchange rate for each company.
Examine the international financial market in which the companies operate.
the noble motivations of war, in particular, is when damage is caused yet he causes notice the damage doesn’t prompt conflict, it relies upon the degree or proportionality, one more condition to jus promotion bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, in any case, contends the possibility of “worthwhile motivation” in light of “Sway” which alludes to the assurance of political and regional freedoms, alongside basic liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more confounded to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Also, it is challenging to quantify proportionality, especially in war, on the grounds that not just that there is an epistemic issue in computing, however again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Besides, Vittola contends war is essential, not just for guarded purposes, ‘since it is legitimate to oppose force with force,’ yet in addition to battle against the uncalled for, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting treacherously towards its own kin or have unjustifiably taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to “show its foes a thing or two,” however principally to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle’s contention: ‘there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). Nonetheless, Frowe contends “self-preservation” has a majority of depictions, found in Chapter 1, demonstrating the way that self-protection can’t necessarily legitimize one’s activities. Considerably more dangerous, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, a totally different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more critically, Frowe discredits Vittola’s view on retaliation in light of the fact that right off the bat it engages the punisher’s power, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through legitimate bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a moderately quiet society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). Above all, Frowe further discredits Vittola through his case that ‘right goal can’t be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,’ recommending we can’t simply hurt another on the grounds that they have accomplished something vile. Different variables should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality.