Internet of Things technology

at
Categories
Tags

Develop your own Internet of Things technology. Find a function, a device, a purpose around which you could
develop that technology. Write a summary document overview addressing the following points:
Explain why there is a need for what you are developing. What area does it address or improve upon? Are
there competitive examples that already exist? How do they lack, and how will yours be different better?
Sketch out examples of your device from various perspectives, labeling each component including physical
interfaces. Be sure its interface is clearly defined. Provide a narrative explaining the device as it is presented in
the sketches.
How will the device be accessed? Sketch out the interface, labelling all the components, describe its
functionality, and indicate its uses.
What will be the security measures put in place to prevent unauthorized access? What data will be collected
and transmitted, why, how will data be stored, and where? Will that data be shared?
Add a summary of who was responsible for which aspects of the project.

Sample Solution

Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of computers, digital and mechanical machines, distinguished by unique identifiers (UIDs) with a capacity to transfer data over a network. The IoT temperature sensor architecture consists of several hardware remote nodes, each fitted with a microcontroller, a sensor, and a communication modem. At the backend is a data interface consisting of data API and a database. The microcontroller is a Raspberry Pi 2 circuit board. The circuit is programmed to detect data variations in temperature.

This device is designed to detect temperature variations which are known to decrease manufacturing efficiency. According to Sudarshan &Tewari (2013), surface temperatures exceeding

Q3. (2) As respects social and household understandings, there is an assumption that the gatherings didn’t expect to make lawful relations however the assumption can be invalidated. For instance, a composed understanding, the two gatherings have isolated, presence of outsider in the understanding. (http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Intention-to-make lawful relations.php) The Court of Appeal built up the rule that understandings among a couple are probably not going to be contracts except if there is clear proof this was in truth the goal. In any case, the standard set out in the Balfour case is especially debilitated if the couple are isolated or thinking about division. For instance, Merritt v Merritt [1970].

In Merritt the court recognized the case from Balfour on the grounds that in spite of the fact that the gatherings were a couple, the understanding was made gatherings were husband and spouse, the understanding was made after they had isolated. Moreover, it was recorded as a hard copy, so it was a lawfully enforceable agreement

Q3. (3) An agreement of offer of merchandise required the purchaser to pay a cash thought, the cost and the topic of the agreement must be products. Merchant’s commitment under the agreement must exchange or consent to move the property in products to the purchaser. There is no compelling reason to specify terms in the non-customer contracts as the Sale of Goods Act 1979 will naturally be inferred. It offers assurance to purchasers which incorporates products sold are of acceptable quality, qualification for the purchaser’s motivation. Right now, had broken of Sale of Goods Act 1979 under segment 13 (1), it suggests a condition that the offer of merchandise will relate with the portrayal. Utilization of this guideline can be found in Beale v Taylor [1967] case. The litigant publicized a vehicle as an ‘Envoy Convertible, white, 1961’. The petitioner assessed and analyzed the vehicle before consenting to buy it. In any case, after the inquirer took the vehicle to a carport for fix, he found that the back of the vehicle was a 1961 back yet the front half was a piece of a previous model. Two vehicles had been harmed and somebody had welded the two sections into a solitary vehicle. It was held that the respondent was at risk for break of Section 13 as the vehicle is sold by the portrayal in the ad regardless of that he had assessed the vehicle.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer