You are a corporate or military senior IT manager (Director/Senior Director/VP-CIO or military equivalent) in your chosen project organization. You are required by the top executives (or military equivalents) to initiate a new organization-wide IT upgrade project (you may choose your own). You agree with this decision, its purposes, and the technology involved. You see this assignment as finally getting your long-sought mandate for improvement that will substantially leverage organizational performance.
However, significant IT changes have not always been welcomed within your organization. In fact, your most recent attempt, which had much less profound change, developed some significant resistance. This time you have decided that you and your unit must do considerable preliminary work to pave the way, gain support for, as well as reduce resistance to, this new and vital effort.
You could plow forward using executive mandate. From your MSITM coursework, you understand that IT change has its best chance for success when it considers the system and is a carefully developed, initiated, and managed process.
Case Assignment
• Describe the organization from the perspective of its current (unclassified) IT operating technology infrastructure, or the IT technology it provides to its internal or external customers). Discuss its technology deployment, effectiveness, and contribution to organizational or customer success. Also discuss dominant IT strategies and tactics.
• Discuss technological barriers to, as well as circumstances which may foster continued IT success and organizational contribution.
As the Senior IT Director at ABC Corporation, a multinational logistics and supply chain company, I oversee the unclassified IT infrastructure that underpins our global operations. Our current technology stack is a mix of legacy and moderately modern systems, characterized by a decentralized deployment model. Each regional office and major warehouse operates on a semi-autonomous IT system, often managed by local teams. For our internal and external customers, this translates to a fragmented experience.
Our core enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is a decade-old, on-premise solution that handles finance, human resources, and inventory management. This system is effective for basic, siloed operations, but it lacks the real-time data visibility and integration capabilities required for a modern, interconnected supply chain. Customer-facing technology is similarly disparate; a few key clients have access to a custom-built portal, while most rely on email and phone for communication. This infrastructure, while functional, is often a bottleneck to organizational and customer success. The lack of a unified platform means that data is often inconsistent, leading to delays and errors in logistics planning.
Our dominant IT strategies and tactics have been reactive and cost-conscious. The primary strategy has been “if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it,” which has led to a patchwork of systems and a high technical debt. Tactics have focused on short-term, incremental fixes rather than long-term strategic investments. This approach has stifled innovation and limited our ability to leverage technology for a competitive advantage.