Security is a prerequisite of enforcing other values and rights. Physical security is of prime importance because it is not possible to enforce another right if the individual is not safe, that is, if something happens to him, for example he is being attacked, beaten, raped, or robbed (Shue, 1996). So, on this basis, we can say that physical security is not just an inalienable right of everyone, but a must and a priority for everyone. As mentioned in section 1, beyond physical security, your sense of security plays a very important role. Security policy is well designed when citizens feel safe. Living in fear can bring out the worst of the people; they can destroy a whole society, so security is not just the individual’s interest but the whole community’s. Furthermore, security is the foundation of the political community (Loader & Walker, 2007), among other things, that is why we give state the power, to create it. For example, according to Raab (2005), “safety state” is above all value. However, to create such a state, not only the rights of individuals and society as a whole should be limited but also the modern democratic society’s main values and the power of the leadership as well. Therefore, we have to ‘civilize’ (Loader & Walker, 2007) security. In line with the argument above, it is necessary to adapt to the jurisprudence of Western-style democracies more, and to incorporate to the political decision making (Székely, Somodi & Szabó, 2017).

Why does the government not use other legal channels against crime and terrorism can also be classified as privacy-related arguments. It is rarely heard that they are surveillance us for the fight against drug trafficking. In addition, there are many laws that just regulate that the authorities might seize the computers and mobile phones of potential criminals and terrorists. The question arises to why they should observe us then.

Most of the regulations and laws are not unlimited and have to