Write a paper comparing and contrasting the decision making, judicial philosophy, their
relations with other Justices, and cases authored of two members of the U.S. Supreme Court, one of which
must have been one of the primary Justices from The Brethren, and the other being a member of the Court
covered in The Nine. For this paper, you will want to bring in material from the three books assigned in class,
but also you will do some outside research about the Justices that you choose, including discussion from at
least one of each of the justices’ cases in which they authored a majority, concurring, or dissenting opinion.
This paper should be a minimum of 6 pages, double spaced with standard margins and 12 point font size. You
may use any recognized academic citation method. However, you must have a separate works cited page (this
does not count towards the page limits). Papers should be properly proofread, and those with bad grammar
(including those that do not use proper nouns correctly, will be penalized). Papers should view the minimum
page requirement as more of a hard and fast rule that students that may be more verbose that may exceed the
limit. Also, keep in mind rules against plagiarism and their possible penalties.
As far as sources, you should have cited at least the following:
1) Each of the three books assigned from the course;
2) At least one case from each Justice you chose (this cannot be the same case for both Justices, but you can
choose cases that are on the same issue) at minimum at least one case from each Justice should be from The
Brethren and The Nine;
3) At least three other sources outside those in items #1 and #2.
To make things easier, I have attached a list of the justices that you may choose from each of the books. You
may NOT choose the same justice for each book.
List of Justices for Each Book
Remember, you cannot pick the same Justice for your two Justices. It has to be a different Justice from each
list.
sibling Modest as having \”exquisite motion, effortlessness of development, and aesthetic poise\”.
He had set aside his work on his symphonic sonnet Fatum so as to give her all his consideration. It appears to be conceivable that Tchaikovsky was
increasingly charmed in her as an artist and on-screen character than as a sentimental intrigue, and experienced issues in isolating the craftsman from the
individual. Tchaikovsky devoted his Romance in F minor for piano, Op. 5, to her.
Before the year’s over, marriage was being considered. It has been said this was Tchaikovsky’s first genuine endeavor to overcome his homosexuality. Her mom,
who was going with her, restricted the marriage and she wedded a Spanish baritone.
Despite the fact that his own life may have been ineffective, Tchaikovsky was consistently finishing a great many sytheses. In 1875, Tchaikovsky\’s reality
debut of his third orchestra was given in Boston on October 25, and was led by Hans von Bulow. In spite of there being pockets of resistance towards his
music, his works and notoriety started to spread across Europe.
In 1877, he wedded an excellent young lady named Anotonina Miliukova, yet separated from her 9 weeks after the fact.
Nadeshda von Meck
During that time of his terrible marriage, Tchaikovsky additionally went into another relationship – just as opposed to meeting eye to eye, they conveyed
through letters. This turned out very well for him given his outrageous timidity, and furthermore to some extent, he didn’t need to perfect the relationship.
The lady was Nadeshda von Meck, the widow of a railroad tycoon who had started contact with him not some time before the marriage with Miliukova. Just as a
significant companion and passionate help, she likewise turned into his patroness for the following 13 years, which permitted him to concentrate only on
arrangement.