In reference to Whippman’s article and argument, why is jurisprudence necessary to ensure minority rights? What is the logic behind the idea? Can it exist in the larger United States, and/or should it be specific to each state? Defend your idea with reasons, examples, details, chains of logic, the primary text, and academic secondary sources. Cite the latter two items appropriately in-text.
Jurisprudence for minority rights
Questions concerning minority rights has long been of international consequence and is at the center of many academic, legal and political debates. Identity claims of minority groups have been recognized and deemed worthy of protection. It is significant to note that nonetheless even today minority issues tend to occasion anxiety amongst people and states. Throughout the history of the modern nation-state, governments have had a tendency to view minorities, especially politically self-conscious minorities, as a potential threat to the political unity or territorial integrity of the states in which they reside. It is therefore, necessary to have jurisprudential understanding of minority rights. This will enable us to gain clarity on questions of the nature of minority rights and the various challenges revolving around them.