As discussed in our lesson and readings, jury selection is a process where the prosecutor and defense
attorney, under the direction of the judge, select jurors to sit on a jury. Each side may challenge a potential juror
in the jury pool on the basis of cause, citing some specific issue with that jurors background or comments
during voir dire. The defense attorney and prosecutor may also remove a potential juror by using one of their
preemptory challenges where they do not need to cite a reason for the jurors removal.
But in a case where the death penalty may be imposed, jurors in the pool are first death penalty qualified
during general voir dire, on the basis that they can follow the law and in fact impose the death penalty prior to
being selected to sit on the jury. in essence, the voir dire process in a death penalty case has two distinct
phases. Lets look at the following scenario as we examine both the general voir dire process and qualifying
jurors in a death penalty case.
Slick, age 29, has a long-standing criminal record that involves drug abuse, burglaries, breaking and enterings,
and assorted theft offenses. One night he enters Long’s Carryout armed with a hand gun. While under the
influence of drugs, he approaches the clerk at the counter and demands all the cash in the register. As the
clerk opens the drawer, Slick is startled by a customer he did not realize was in the store. Thinking the person
is reaching for a gun, Slick turns and shoots the customer in the chest, killing him. As he turns back to the
clerk, he grabs the cash from her and stuffs it in his pocket. But then he realizes she has seen what he has
done. Consumed with fear, Slick jumps over the counter and grabs the woman dragging her by her hoodie to
the back of the store into the manager’s office. There he grabs some more money on the manager’s desk. As
he begins to leave, he turns back to the clerk and shoots her two times in the face, killing her instantly.
The clerk, Ms. Ray, was a 46-year-old woman. She was a divorced mother of two small children, who took the
clerk position as a part-time job to make ends meet. The customer in the store, Mr. Franklin was 45 years old
and an army veteran who had fallen on hard times. He was homeless at the time when he was killed, not
employed and estranged from his family.
Juror 1: She is a female who works for the state. She had been employed by the state for 25 years. She is
married with four children. Her husband is a veteran who is employed at a private cement company.
Juror 2: He is a 70-year-old retired man, divorced but remarried. He worked for an insurance company as an
adjuster. He has four children, one of which is a police officer.
Juror 3: She is a 21-year-old college student studying political science. She identifies herself as a progressive
democrat. She is very supportive of various causes on campus, including the legalization of drugs and the
decriminalization of drug offenses and certain sentencing reform measures. Two years ago, she was a victim of
a robbery offense where the suspect threw her on the ground while snatching her purse. She is single with no
children.
Juror 4: He is a 55-year-old minister who is head pastor at his church. He is married with one daughter. He is
active in a prison ministry program that goes into local prisons to work with inmates.
Juror 5: She is 28-year-old stay-at-home mom with two children. Her husband works as a mechanic. Four
years prior, there home was burglarized. The person was caught and prosecuted for the crime and is now
serving a prison term.
Based on the following information, lets examine the voir dire process generally and in a death penalty case.
Answer the following.
What are preemptory challenges and challenges for cause?
From the prosecutions stand point, which juror (listed above) may they exercise a preemptory challenge or a
challenge for cause? Explain your reasoning.
From the defense’s stand point, which juror (listed above) may they exercise a preemptory challenge or a
challenge for cause? Explain your reasoning.
What are Batson Challenges, and how can they impact the jury selection process?
Cindy Jackson as of now holds ahead of all comers in the Guinness Book of World Records for experiencing the most successive corrective medical procedures. While growing up, Cindy viewed herself as plain and ugly by her delightful sister, so she concluded that she needed to accomplish something. At age six Cindy was fixated on looking like Barbie. Cindy expressed, “I took a gander at a Barbie doll and stated, ‘this is what I need to resemble, I need to be her’,” (Leung 1). At age twenty-one Cindy pressed up and moved to London, England, where she needed to begin another, prettier life. It took more than thirty-one medical procedures, fourteen years, and 500,000 dollars to turn into the “human Barbie.” Now she has her very own site, book, and multi-million dollar companions, to the detriment of her body.
Cindy Jackson is a case of how far individuals are happy to go to look impeccable in this general public. Magnificence is misshaped by the media and by the toy business. In the present society skinnier is better, and individuals are eager to experience anything to accomplish this. Kids ought not be presented to these thoughts. Rather, youngsters should simply be kids. Placing the Barbie doll under the control of kids instructs them that they have to resemble her: immaculate. In spite of the fact that, Barbie isn’t simply the main sole reason for low fulfillment however is a contributing element. Barbie has been demonstrated to give youngsters who play with her lower confidence and incite expanded wants to look skinnier. Barbie has negative effects on self-perception and causes lower body fulfillment levels among little youngsters, by giving kids falsifications and weights about being thin and flawless.
Barbie is the best toy of the twentieth century and the supposed symbol of female excellence (Kuther 39). Most young ladies from the ages three to ten have in any event had one doll growing up. In spite of the fact that, she’s well known now she is really dependent on another prevalent doll from Germany. The dolls name was Bild Lilli she was a unique animation character of an unequivocal funny cartoon intended for grown-up men. “On August 12, 1955 Lilli was first sold in Germany, typically found in smoke shops and a couple of toy stores,” (Bild 1). Barbie was dependent on the Lilli doll by Ruth Handler; she traveled to Europe on an excursion and purchased a couple Lilli dolls. When she returned back to New York Handler re-structured the doll to make Barbie, which was named after her granddaughter Barbara. Presently Barbie is the most sold doll on the planet, Barbie is a 1.5 million dollar for each year industry (Dittmar 283).
Barbie gives youngsters a feeling of low confidence. Three formative therapists uncovered one hundred twenty-six English kids from ages five to eight to an investigation of how Barbie impacts self-perception. They were presented to either Barbie dolls, Emme dolls (an increasingly ordinary proportioned doll), or no dolls and afterward finished assignments dependent on what they saw. Helga Dittmar finishes up, “Young ladies presented to Barbie detailed lower body regard and more noteworthy want for a more slender body shape than young ladies in the other presentation conditions” (284). Dittmar proceeds, “regardless of whether dolls stop to work as hopeful good examples for more established young ladies, early presentation to dolls encapsulating a ridiculously slight body perfect may harm young ladies’ self-perception, which would add to an expanded danger of scattered eating and weight cycling” (290). This examination demonstrates the way that Barbie has some sort of hold over children. Since young ladies play with these dolls they are the most affected by her since they are so youthful. On the off chance that we demonstrate our kids these pictures and guide them to play with them, they will demonstrate some kind of adoring to the dolls.
Handler’s granddaughter Stacey has composed a book about her complexities with living in the shadows of the Barbie doll. She has had numerous difficulties keeping up her weight to mix into the family. Stacey Handler has encountered the life after Barbie as it has been a major part of her life by and by. Her book The Body Burden, Living In the Shadow of Barbie uncovers her own account of a lifetime fight with self-perception. She straightforwardly reveals her own sentiments about the Barbie doll, her grandma’s apparently honest “immaculate” creation. She shares her snapshots of low confidence, including fears, instabilities, and mutilated self-perception that have been offered on her (213).
She talks about society’s ridiculous self-perceptions and how hard it is for young ladies to alter and adore themselves for what their identity is (215). For the initial couple of parts she communicates her emotions through sonnets and rhyming tunes (1). Handler states, “They never observe behind the window ornaments that conceal every one of my blemishes… I was expelled from the racks where the ideal me … stayed without a solitary tear… I worked throughout the day and night to dispose of my abundance cellulite until I looked… flawless according to society” (12-13). Stacey felt overpowered by what her grandma had developed. She was always eating fewer carbs and rehearsing unfortunate propensities for losing the abundance weight.
Besides, incorporates the questionable data of the Barbie. This incorporates the genuine Barbie and her estimations. Barbie was intended to look impeccable in light of the fact that for what reason would a youngster play with a doll with flaws or split dry skin. These dolls are made to look immaculate and practically automated (one looking precisely like the other). Despite the fact that Barbie has as of late turned fifty years of age regardless she appears as though she is twenty. She remains so youthful simply because youngsters would not play with a grandma looking doll, it would be out of their probable hood to play with her. The youngsters would not admire her. Her body figure is dubious in light of the fact that it exhibits a little abdomen, long legs, adequate chest, and streaming fair bolts (Winterman 1). Some contend her body shape would be impractical and unsustainable whenever scaled up to life-size.
Denise Winterman states, “They guarantee she would not have the option to stand up in light of the fact that her body edge would be so uneven. A genuine Barbie would basically fall more than” .An investigation at Southern Australia University propose the probability of a lady having Barbie’s body shape is one out of one hundred thousand so not feasible, yet incredibly uncommon ( Winterman 1). Winterman claims, “Specialists at Finland’s University Central Hospital in Helsinki state if Barbie were life size she would come up short on the seventeen to twenty-two percent muscle to fat ratio required for a lady to bleed. So once more, not an unachievable figure, yet surely not a sound one” . On the off chance that Barbie were a genuine individual, she would stand five foot two inches and weigh roughly one hundred ten pounds. Her midriff would quantify an exceptional 20 inches, her chest thirty-eight inches, and her hips thirty-four inches (Kuther 322).
Third toys give kids an impact particularly at more youthful ages. Barbie is in fact promoted to youngsters who are youthful, essentially three to multi year olds. Youngsters who play with toys at matured three to eight are said to be affected more from the toys they play with than the multi year olds publicized too additionally (Duffy 1). Judith Duffy recommends that young ladies as youthful as five stress over their weight in the wake of playing with ridiculously thin figures, for example, the Barbie . Duffy’s article is a rundown of realities dependent on young lady’s optimal of magnificence inside the previous five years. For instance, an ongoing report performed on one hundred thirty fifteen-year-old Scottish young ladies has uncovered that around fifty two percent believed themselves to be “excessively fat”, and twenty-nine percent were effectively attempting to get thinner . This is ludicrous thinking about that multi year olds are simply starting their secondary school profession. These young people ought to be more focused on their examinations than on their should be impeccable and size two.
A few scholars, women’s activists and analysts think Barbie is a positive good example and a solid picture for little youngsters to have. For instance, Deb Mehecke essayist of the article “Reexamining Barbie,” clarifies that Barbie allows youngsters to utilize their minds and the chance to mother something . She additionally guarantees, Barbie enables young ladies to dream pretty much the majority of the conceivable outcomes, Barbie can be a specialist, a space explorer, a financier, a legal advisor, a medical caretaker, an acrobat and so forth… ” . Kids do get a kick out of the chance to mother their toys and imagine they are genuine, however do we need to give our youngsters such an improper doll. We could give our youngsters a water child or a cabbage fix doll, for what reason do we demand they deal with such an alluring doll?
Formative clinician Julia Griffin expressed her concept of Barbie in her article “Scholastics Like to Play with Barbie as well.” Griffin discloses Barbie is basic to a young lady’s improvement in a social cooperation alongside social qualities . Rather than Barbie being the fundamental piece of a tyke’s life, guardians should enable their kids to create social association and social worth abilities. Numerous individuals think Barbie has nothing to do with dietary problems and the negative self-perception in little youngsters. Mattel, the organization that creates the doll denies all negative allegations with Barbie and the negative influences it rings to the youngsters who play with her.
Arrangements are an absolute necessity with this issue such arrangements are: exchange dolls for youngsters and youthful adolescents, parent obligation and encouraging feedback of self-perception, and organizations need to make dolls progressively reasonable. Some substitute dolls for little youngsters would be the Groovy Girl dolls, and the Cabbage Patch Kid dolls, and for the more established age bunches the American Girl Doll and Emme.
The Groovy Girl dolls are sold at Target stores across the nation, and sell for around sixteen to nineteen dollars. These dolls can be viewed as costly yet they take after youngsters, in proper garments and offer incredible qualities to kids.