K-Swiss

 

K-Swiss was founded in 1966 in California by brothers Art and Ernest Brunner. The pair
enjoyed skiing and tennis, and it was their desire to design a shoe specifically for the demands of
tennis players. The result was the first all-leather tennis shoe, and it caught on quickly among
tennis players and upscale consumers. K-Swiss was different from most athletic footwear
companies in that it did not bring new styles to market frequently, nor did it branch out to other
sports as companies like Nike and Reebok did during the 1980s. And, unlike other footwear
brands, K-Swiss spent little money on advertising. The focus continued on offering high quality
shoes for tennis until the early 1990s. At that time, K-Swiss extended its product line to include
shoes for aerobics, basketball, and hiking. In the mid-1990s, K-Swiss sought to appeal to a
young, active market in addition to its core upscale market.1
The move to expand the target market worked for K-Swiss as sales grew by positioning KSwiss as a lifestyle brand. K-Swiss targeted 14 to 24-year-olds, a lucrative segment that buys
50% of all athletic footwear.2 However, the fact remained that K-Swiss is a tiny company
compared to Nike and Reebok. Also, other brands known for athletic footwear were positioned
against lifestyle, most notably Puma and Converse. Competition from brands such as Vans,
Skechers, and Under Armour made competition in the footwear market even fiercer. The KSwiss classic tennis shoe continued to perform decently in the tennis market, but styles aimed at
the lifestyle segment did not always meet expectations.
A new chapter began for K-Swiss in 2016 when Barney Waters was named President of the
company. He resolved to return the company to its tennis heritage and market to underserved
niches. Waters said K-Swiss had lost focus. His goal was to remake K-Swiss as “a specialist
again rather than a generalist.”3 That aim is rooted in realities of being a small brand competing
in an industry with giant competitors like Nike and Adidas.
Being a small player in the large athletic footwear market creates challenges for K-Swiss.
The brand has taken different approaches to product and communication strategy in the footwear
category. Unlike its larger competitors, K-Swiss does not have a deep roster of athlete endorsers.
Where Under Armour has more than 50 athletes and celebrities as endorsers, K-Swiss does not
have an athlete immediately recognized as the face of the brand.
The difference between K-Swiss and competitors might not be the weakness that it appears.
Nike and Under Armour in particular are saddled with millions of dollars in sponsorship
obligations to athletes and teams. One footwear industry analyst called the celebrity endorser
model “broken.” Paying athletes to endorse shoe brands is perceived as inauthentic.4 K-Swiss is
free of high marketing expenses that put a drag on profits.
The decision by K-Swiss to avoid intense competition in mainstream segments of the athletic
footwear category has prompted the brand to seek less crowded spaces. A unique approach taken
with brand strategy was to associate the K-Swiss brand with entrepreneurship. A campaign
called “Generation K-Swiss” featured influencers and creatives. Video interviews explore their
entrepreneurial journey and feature their competitive spirit. K-Swiss aims to outfit entrepreneurs
whose personas fit with the brand’s drive for excellence and competition.5 The star of the
Generation K-Swiss was Gary Vaynerchuk, a serial entrepreneur, author, and owner of Vayner
Media. K-Swiss introduced two styles in its men’s style line designed by Vaynerchuk—the GenK Icon Knit Gary Vee and Court Frasco Gary Vee. K-Swiss looked to leverage the growing
visibility of successful entrepreneurs. Just as basketball players wear Jordans to “be like Mike,”
will aspiring entrepreneurs adopt the fashions of their business role models? Values of
entrepreneurs like grit and determination are brand associations that could positively influence
perceptions of K-Swiss.
Another market segment that has received attention from K-Swiss is esports. K-Swiss first
developed a lifestyle sneaker for gaming in a collaboration with Immortals Gaming Club in
2018. The next year, K-Swiss and IGC collaborated again to develop the first mass-produced
sneaker for esports athletes: the MIBR One-Tap. The MIBR branding element is a nod to Made
in Brazil, an esports team acquired by IGC in 2018. K-Swiss President Barney Waters
commented on the potential of esports: “(Esports) is too big and growing too fast to be ignored.
While I think a lot of brands are sleeping for the moment, it’s only a matter of time before they
catch up.”
The focus on entrepreneurs and esports is consistent with the strategy to avoid competition
with big sneaker brands in larger segments such as running and basketball. K-Swiss Barney
Waters said “As a challenger brand, I’m always looking for these opportunities to stand apart to
do something different and new. I think it’s only a matter of time that every brand gets involved.
But, we are able to get ‘first-mover’ advantage in that we announced the first signature sneaker
for an esports team.”6
In addition to entrepreneurs and esports, K-Swiss has pursued opportunities to tap into
popular culture. Among the collaborations involving K-Swiss sneaker styles were movies
including “Clueless,” “Ghostbusters,” and “El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie.” In another
collaboration, K-Swiss partnered with mobile gaming brand Angry Birds to create two limitededition sneaker styles in honor of the app’s 10th anniversary. As influence shifts from mainstream
celebrities to influencers with modest audiences, the opportunities for K-Swiss to tap niche
segments appears limitless.
Decision:
K-Swiss is currently targeting three segments in the footwear market:
• Tennis amateurs and professionals (tennis shoes)
• Entrepreneurs, creatives, and fashion conscious consumers (Generation K style shoes)
• Esports.
You have been hired as Chief Marketing Officer for K-Swiss. You have been tasked by the CEO
to prioritize the three market segments in order of their potential to impact company growth.
Identify the market segment that should be the top priority for K-Swiss. Your justification should
include limitations of the other two segments that prompted them to not be selected as top
priority. Support your decision by drawing support from occurrences or trends in the internal and
external environment mentioned in the scenario that would be conducive to your
recommendation.

Sample Solution

socialist framework. The non-cutthroat nature of socialism has negative ramifications on all levels. The common realizes they are ensured similar advantages paying little heed to how much work they’re doing, and the way that well they’re getting it done. The space for financial development is negligible. At a more significant level, there is no contest between firms, which causes a stagnation. No monetary development prompts despondency, which prompts political kickback, and insurgencies.

Private enterprise brings about financial development since it takes care of advancement through rivalry. China has fostered an inexorably unrestricted economy. The Soviet Association was imaginative at whatever point they were associated with rivaling the US, however for items just dispersed inside their country, it was consistently the absolute minimum. The “imperceptible hand” of rivalry, carries the market to a characteristic balance as indicated by Adam Smith. Contest upholds individual development too, and in the end brings about additional specializations of work.

A significant differentiation among free enterprise and socialism is equivalent open door sections equivalent result. Private enterprise upholds equivalent open door, however this consequently brings about an inconsistent result due to the fluctuating sums where various individuals will work. Socialism then again upholds equivalent result. There ought to be no abundance holes in a socialist state since it doesn’t make any difference how much work an individual places into succeeding, they end up with a similar outcome. There is no rivalry, and there is no an open door for development.

China was essentially socialist before for most of the twentieth 100 years, yet they started progressing into a blended economy during the 90’s. They’ve encountered extraordinary monetary development because of this change. In 1990, China’s Gross domestic product was 360.585 billion USD, and in 2011 12.238 trillion USD (China, 2017). The gross ostensible pay, GNI, per capita has additionally developed from 330 USD in 1990, to 8, 690 USD in 2017 (China, 2017). The new arrangement for China is to zero in on development and turning into an innovator in mechanical advances. “Made in China 2025” is an arrangement set out by Xi Jinping to change the Chinese economy to a blended economy rather than a controlled economy (Amadeo, 2018). They are perceiving the relationship that development and rivalry have in encouraging the economy. China’s arrangements to develop into a blended economy in with additional privatized markets will transform China into an all the more financially adjusted country.

Europe additionally gives an illustration of how entrepreneur standards benefit the economy. The European Association set out 10 billion Euros in their spending plan in 2015 for Skyline 2020, an examination and development program (Spending plan, 2014). Skyline 2020 is a program that was started to expand Europe’s intensity

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.