Kotter’s 8 steps

Think of a recent change that happened in your organization. Try to focus on a large change, not just a small change in artifacts, such as a form. It might be a policy change, a change in leadership, a change in organizational goals. Think about how it was implemented.

Based on Kotter’s 8 steps, describe the change. Did your organization follow each step? If so, describe how. If not, describe how “skipping” that step may have impacted the change and how employees responded to it. Use at least two class resources in your post. Remember to cite correctly.

Respond to two colleagues

Activity # 2

In chapter 16, Schein describes the three stages of change. How do they compare to Kotter’s 8 steps of change?

 

 

Sample Solution

istinction between the mind and the body. The mind is essentially thinking and the body is essentially extended so that the two have nothing in common. In Descartes’ Meditations on Philosophy, there is a character, the mediator, and he reasons that he might cast all the opinions of others into doubt if he can doubt the foundations of basic principles upon which his opinions are founded.

In the first meditation, Descartes rejects as if false any belief that is open to doubt. He pushes skepticism to its limits by introducing the notion of an “evil demon”, a being that always tricks us into believing true what is actually false. The only certainty that Descartes can find is that nothing is certain. Knowledge acquired through the senses was called into doubt by argument from dreaming and knowledge acquired through intellect was called into doubt by the evil demon argument.

In Descartes Meditation Two, Descartes comes up with the argument of God’s existence because he began to wonder something. He began to wonder if he exists. “I think, I exist.” He had previously concluded that the world, minds, bodies, etc. did not exists and then began to doubt the existence of himself. But, to have been able to doubt this and to have the “deceiver” deceive him into thinking that he does not exist, then he concludes that he must exist in order to have been deceived. Descartes argues that even assuming there is an evil spirit who constantly deceives me, it is certain that my own self exists: for the very notion of an evil spirit assumes that the spirit deceives someone; me. So even if constantly deceived, I can’t doubt that I exist. Descartes holds that the sentence “I exist” must be true whenever I think it to myself. I may utterly deceive as to what I believe but even the most radical doubt of all, which is doubting my own existence, must imply that I exist. He creates the phrase, “cogito ergo sum.” This means, I think therefore I am. So according to Descartes, if he is able to think and reason, he exists. But in addition to that he can sense and imagine. However, Descartes believes that the senses and imagination are not trustworthy. Our senses are sometimes wrong and are not reliable, and therefore doubt is necessary. Our imagination has the ability to make up things that do not exist, and for that reason it is not reliable to knowing our essence. The ability to reason and our intellect prove to be much more reliable to knowing than the body and senses are.

The third meditation is titled “ The existence of God.” In his third meditation, De

This question has been answered.

Get Answer