Piper’s statement highlights the innate human capacity for language acquisition. It suggests that humans are biologically predisposed to learn language, and that this ability is present from birth. This perspective aligns with the nativist theory of language acquisition, which posits that humans possess a language acquisition device (LAD) in their brains that facilitates language learning.

I agree with Piper’s statement. There is substantial evidence to support the idea that language is a uniquely human trait and that children are born with a predisposition to learn it. For example, children acquire language rapidly and effortlessly, even in environments where they are exposed to multiple languages. This suggests that there is something innate about language learning that allows children to acquire it so quickly.

Furthermore, studies have shown that children can distinguish between different phonemes and grammatical structures from a very young age. This suggests that they are born with a sensitivity to language and that they are able to process and learn language in ways that are not possible for other animals.

However, it is important to note that while children are born with the necessary “equipment” to learn language, environmental factors also play a crucial role. Exposure to language is essential for language development, and children who are deprived of language exposure may experience delays in language acquisition. Additionally, the specific language that a child learns is influenced by the language(s) spoken in their environment.

In conclusion, Piper’s statement accurately reflects the current understanding of language acquisition. While humans are born with the innate capacity to learn language, environmental factors also play a significant role in language development.