Law enforcement in America traces its origins to England.

 

 

Law enforcement in America traces its origins to England. Explain early English approaches to community protection and policing in rural and urban areas.
Explain the purpose of the London Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 and Sir Robert Peel’s influence on modern policing.
Compare and contrast the main characteristics of the three traditional eras of policing and note the time frame during which each existed.
Explain the significance of the U.S. Constitution in terms of setting law in this country and its role in establishing the foundation for the criminal justice system.
During the 20th Century a number of blue-ribbon commissions, committees, and task forces reviewed the activities of American law enforcement and made similar reform recommendations throughout the century. Despite the recommendations, some critics claim law enforcement has not changed very much. In other words, the same problems are still there. Do you agree or disagree? Why?

Sample Solution

Rural Areas: In early England, rural communities relied primarily on self-protection and mutual assistance. Local landowners, often serving as justices of the peace, were responsible for maintaining order and enforcing the law. The “hue and cry” system, where neighbors were obligated to pursue criminals, was a common practice.

Urban Areas: As urban centers grew, the need for more formalized policing became apparent. Watchmen were appointed to patrol the streets at night, guarding against crime and fires. These watchmen were often supplemented by constables, who had more extensive policing powers.

The London Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 and Sir Robert Peel

The London Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 marked a significant turning point in English policing. It established the Metropolitan Police, the first professional, uniformed police force in England. Sir Robert Peel, the Home Secretary at the time, is credited with creating this new force.

Peel’s philosophy of policing emphasized prevention rather than reactive enforcement. He believed that police should maintain public order through their presence and the trust of the community. Peel’s principles, known as the “Peel Principles,” continue to influence modern policing.

Three Traditional Eras of Policing

  1. Reactive Era (1829-1920): This era was characterized by a focus on responding to crime after it occurred. Police were primarily concerned with apprehending criminals and maintaining order through force.
  2. Proactive Era (1920-1960): During this era, police began to adopt more proactive strategies, such as preventive patrol and community relations. The goal was to prevent crime before it happened.
  3. Community Policing Era (1960-Present): This era emphasized partnerships between police and communities. Police officers were encouraged to develop relationships with residents and work together to address crime and other community issues.

The Significance of the U.S. Constitution

The U.S. Constitution serves as the supreme law of the land and provides the foundation for the American criminal justice system. It outlines the powers of the federal government, including law enforcement, and protects the rights of individuals. The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, guarantees fundamental freedoms such as the right to due process, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the right to a fair trial.

The State of American Law Enforcement

The argument that American law enforcement has not changed significantly despite numerous reform recommendations is a complex one. While there have been improvements in certain areas, such as community policing and advancements in technology, many challenges persist.

Arguments for Change:

  • Systemic Racism: Systemic racism within law enforcement remains a significant issue, as evidenced by disproportionate policing and use of force against communities of color.
  • Lack of Accountability: In some cases, police officers are not held accountable for misconduct, eroding public trust.
  • Over-Policing: Over-policing, particularly in marginalized communities, can lead to negative interactions and civil liberties violations.

Arguments Against Significant Change:

  • Complexity of the Issue: Reforming law enforcement is a complex task that involves addressing systemic issues, training officers, and implementing new policies.
  • Resistance to Change: Some law enforcement agencies may be resistant to change, particularly if it involves challenging existing practices or traditions.
  • Limited Resources: Implementing reforms can be expensive and may require additional resources that are not always available.

Ultimately, whether American law enforcement has significantly changed is a matter of perspective. While there have been improvements, the challenges of systemic racism, accountability, and over-policing persist. Addressing these issues will require continued efforts from law enforcement agencies, policymakers, and communities.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer