Law you would change or eliminate in the CA Penal Code


Describing what law you would change or eliminate in the CA Penal Code. The second part of the paper requires that you create a new law. The law that you create can not be currently listed in the CA Penal Code, Municipal Code, Vehicle Code, etc. You are acting as the legislator. Think about what law you believe should be implemented and describe it. Make sure you incorporate the elements of the crime and penalty for violating the crime, that you established.

Sample Answer

The Penal Code of California forms the basis for the application of criminal law in the American state of California. It was originally enacted in 1872 as one of the original four California Codes, and has been substantially amended and revised since then. The penal code defines all the offences under the state of California and their punishments. The offence that should be amended in the penal code is the one under the water Act that makes it an offence to use more than 55 gallons of water per day.

The Constitution is viewed as the preeminent tradition that must be adhered to, however it is likewise viewed as pliant by a few heads of the Church. In Lincoln's second condition of the association address he expresses, "The creeds of the calm past, are lacking to the stormy present." This comment reverberates agreeably with the Latter-day Saint point of view of the Constitution. A few heads of the Church have communicated that Constitution is in an ever-developing state, intended to suit the necessities of those for whom it was made to secure. J. Reuben Clark, a conspicuous lawyer and pioneer inside the Church, said the accompanying in a 1938 location: "It isn't my conviction nor is it the teaching of my Church that the Constitution is a completely developed archive. Unexpectedly, we trust it must develop and create to meet the changing needs of a propelling world" (Clark 6). This announcement features the natural flexibility of the Constitution. Apparently, the confidence in the intensity of heavenly expert in creating and impacting the report may permit us the knowledge important to comprehend this proposed flexibility.

The central Latter-day Saint perspective on the Constitution is that the record was supernaturally enlivened and should be deliberately refined to suit the requirements of the populace. Be that as it may, how does our comprehension of the Latter-day Saint point of view manage us in satisfying our urban obligation? Dallin H. Oaks offers some solid, compact understanding into how this might be accomplished, "They ought to be comfortable with its incredible essentials: the partition of forces, the individual certifications in the Bill of Rights, the structure of federalism, the sway of the individuals, and the standards of the standard of the law. They ought to restrict any encroachment of these roused essentials" (Oaks 8). For sure, it is basic. The best way to fulfill our metro commitment is to keep and maintain the standards of this archive, and to contemplate and comprehend the rights restricted from now on