Legal Risks Of Nurses

at
Categories
Tags

 

On the afternoon of May 20, the patient, Mr. Ard, began feeling nauseated. He was in pain and had shortness of breath. Although his wife rang the call bell several times, it was not until sometime later that evening that someone responded and gave Ard medication for the nausea. The nausea continued to worsen. Mrs. Ard then noticed that her husband was having difficulty breathing. He was reeling from side to side in bed. Believing that her husband was dying, she continued to call for help. She estimated that she rang the call bell for 1.25 hours before anyone responded. A code was eventually called. Unfortunately, Mr. Ard did not survive the code. There was no documentation in the medical records for May 20, between 5:30 PM and 6:45 PM, that would indicate that any nurse or physician checked on Ard’s condition. This finding collaborated Mrs. Ard’s testimony regarding this time period.

A wrongful death action was brought against the hospital, and the district court granted judgment for Mrs. Ard. The hospital appealed.

Ms. Krebs, an expert in general nursing, stated that it should have been obvious to the nurses from the physicians’ progress notes that the patient was a high risk for aspiration. This problem was never addressed in the nurses’ care plan or in the nurses’ notes.

On May 20, Ard’s assigned nurse was Ms. Florscheim. Krebs stated that Florscheim did not perform a full assessment of the patient’s respiratory and lung status. There was nothing in the record indicating that she completed such an evaluation after he vomited. Krebs also testified that a nurse did not conduct a swallowing assessment at any time. Although Florscheim testified that she checked on the patient around 6:00 PM on May 20, there was no documentation in the medical record. Ms. Farris, an expert witness for the defense, testified on cross-examination that if a patient was in the type of distress described by Mrs. Ard and no nurse checked on him for 1.25 hours, that would fall below the expected standard of care.1

 

 

What happened?
Why did things go wrong?
What were the relevant legal issues?
How could the event have been prevented?
What is your verdict?

Sample Solution

Created economies think about FDI as A motor of market access in creating and less created nations versus for their own innovative advancement and in keeping up with their own monetary interaction and improvement. Emerging country’s appearance at FDI as an inventory of filling the investment funds, trade saves, income, shortage, the executives and mechanical holes. FDI is considered as AN instrument of worldwide monetary incorporation since it brings a bundle of resources as well as capital, innovation, social control abilities and capacity and admittance to unfamiliar business sectors. The effect of FDI relies upon the country’s homegrown approach and strategy. Subsequently FDI contains a wide determination of effect on the nation’s strategy. In order to survey the effect of unfamiliar direct speculation on monetary interaction, 2 models were outlined and fitted. The unfamiliar direct speculation model shows the elements affecting the unfamiliar direct interest in Bharat. The monetary cycle model portrays the commitment of unfamiliar direct venture to financial interaction.

2.1 Choice of Variables:

Financial marks of AN economy region unit considered on the grounds that the significant force elements of FDI inflows to a rural. The examination of higher than hypothetical guideline and existing writing conjointly gives a base in choosing the legitimate mix of useful factors that makes sense of the varieties inside the progressions of FDI inside the country. In order to have the least complex mix of useful factors for the determinants of FDI inflows into Bharat, totally various options blend of factors were known then measurable. The decision combos of factors encased inside the review region unit in line with the prominent particulars given by worldwide association Conference on Trade and

Advancement, (UNCTAD 2007). The review applies the direct and numerous connection strategy to search out the enlightening factors of the FDI inflows inside the country. The multivariate examination has been give out in 2 stages. Inside the opening, all factors region unit taken into thought inside the admirable model. Inside the subsequent stage, the inconsequential factors region unit destined to keep away from the question of multi-collinearity thus the factors region unit hand-picked. Nonetheless, when careful examination of the different mix of the instructive factors, this study incorporates the ensuing monetary markers: all out exchange (TRADEGDP), investigation and improvement use (R&DGDP), cash position (FIN.Position), rate (EXR), trade saves (RESERVESGDP), and unfamiliar direct venture (FDI), unfamiliar direct speculation pace of development (FDIG) and level of financial interaction (GDPG). These financial aspects markers region unit considered on the grounds that the force elements of FDI inflows inside the country. In various words, it’s previously mentioned that FDI inflows in Bharat at blend level will be considered in light of the fact that the perform of those previously mentioned financial aspects pointers. 2.1.1 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: It is one of most significant autonomous variable utilized in this report. There is a decent expansion in the GDP in the year 2005 that has set the country in a decent situation in the gathering of 12 nations. India has made his place and shown its place by gaining a decent headway in the IT office, top of the line quality administrations and information administrations. It has acquired a development pace of 9% in the over and again of t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer