Linguistic features of the Old English language of the Anglo-Saxon people

 

 

 

 

1. What are some of the linguistic features of the Old English language of the Anglo-Saxon people? Compare these with Modern English where possible and discuss which features have been lost and which have remained. You may/should discuss sounds (consonants and vowels), vocabulary, grammar, suffixes, verbs, nouns, or any other aspect we have covered in class or in the textbooks etc.
2. Provide a history of the various external factors that have influenced English vocabulary, starting from the Proto-Germanic (ca 200 BCE) period, and proceeding to the Mid-1400s.
What were the changes these external factors caused?
3. Compare Old English to Middle English. Describe some specific differences and what changes the language underwent between 1100 – 1450 or so. You may/should discuss sounds (consonants and vowels), vocabulary, grammar, suffixes, verbs, nouns or any other

Sample Solution

Old English, a variant of West Germanic, was spoken by Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. In grammar, Old English is chiefly distinguished from later stages in the history of English by greater use of a larger set of inflections in verbs, nouns, adjectives, and pronouns, and also (connected with this) by a rather less fixed word order; it also preserves grammatical gender in nouns and adjectives. Old English was characterized by strong and weak verbs; a dual number for pronouns (for example, a form for we two as well as for we); two different declensions of adjectives; four declensions of nouns; and grammatical distinctions of gender.

pete with the European Association. The fundamental parts of NAFTA are: focusing on manages the nations associated with the economic alliance and having no duties. NAFTA is the biggest world’s biggest international alliance. There has been a consistent relationship with the nations in question, and no conflicts have happened. In the event that the arrangement were to be destroyed, the U.S. would lose roughly 195 billion USD by 2025 (Erken, 2018). Canada would lose roughly 30 billion USD, and Mexico would lose 33 billion USD (Erken, 2018). These numbers just figure the deficiency of cash prompted by duties, yet in a circumstance of battle, there would be a more prominent financial harm.

In a condition of war, the monetary limitations duplicate, since exchange stops between nations engaged with wars out and out. The business sectors are shut, and the financial harmony shifts; supply doesn’t approach interest. Balance movements can cause things the misuse of items, as well as despondent residents. Nations understand this gamble and don’t engage in battles nations they have manages. Coalitions shaped before wars are normally the ones that remain once a conflict starts, which is exhibited by WWI with Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia. Then again, globalization restricts the moves that nations will make to help when it is really required. Globalized economies forestall superfluous conflicts, yet in addition forestall essential mediations. A model is the Jamal Kashoggi murder case in 2018. Indeed, even after examinations, and the affirmation of the homicide being requested by the Saudi sovereign, the U.S. didn’t recognize their obligation. This is for the most part because of the significant presence of oil in Saudi Arabia, and the U.S’s. reliance and interest in that resource.

The European Association is one more association that has added to the globalization of the economy. It comprises of 27 nations. The idea of an association started after WWII when numerous nations were battling financially, yet in addition needed to accommodate their struggles, especially among France and Germany. The essential objective of the European Association is to advance financial development by making it simpler for European nations to develop their economies and incorporate their economies with other European nations. Since the development of the European Association, there have been no conflicts between nations inside the EU. In 2012, the EU won the Nobel Harmony Prize, as a matter of fact. They won for their obligation to “the headway of harmony and compromise, a vote based system and common freedoms in Europe” (Williams, 2016). The Nobel council likewise perceived the association of the EU and the change from a conflict ridden Europe, to a quiet Europe. None of the nations at present in the EU have had battles with one another, regardless of a long history of battles before its formati

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.