Literature Review

at
Categories
Tags

 

Your paper needs to follow the following criteria:

Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about.
Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-build narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be including in the paper).
Write a five (5) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the one’s analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections.
The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title).
Abstract is not required
Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}).
The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and other information that establish credibility to your paper.
The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies.
The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section you would discussion any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.
Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings and any major recommendation for the profession.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

 

 

Retribution in Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy

In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s retribution, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their fundamental topic and shows are comparative, the two plays show a differentiating picture of retribution; as opposed to “Justice fighter’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment constrained by the creator’s social data and lacking

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the vengeance of the renaissance (“misfortune of retribution”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare entangles the fundamental retribution plot by making three retribution plots. By including significant developments, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

Misfortune of retribution of Hamlet Shakespeare’s misfortune dramatization “Hamlet” is for the most part viewed as a misfortune of vengeance by artistic pundits. This article is proposed to clarify how Hamlet satisfies the requests of misfortune. In this reality that Hamlet about totally demonstrates that it is the awfulness of vengeance, this dramatization relates to the outflow of the “run of the mill” retribution misfortune of the Elizabethan time. Felice Abrams and Alan Brody invigorated us a progressively predictable consistency in “misfortune equation of Hamlet and Elizabeth’s retribution”: Hamlet’s demise remembers 10 passings for Hamlet There is “imaginary”

Hamlet and vengeance are hopeless organizations attempting retribution and those looking for retribution (Hamlet) in the long run face passing after the wrongdoing. History of misfortune of retribution Prosser’s view on Hamlet’s retribution “Legends are encouraged to fight back, as most misfortunes of retaliation, casualties or wrongdoings are straightforwardly identified with the hero” (Prosser) notwithstanding Hamlet There is likewise a play of Shakespeare. The impacts of the awfulness of vengeance incorporate Julius Caesar, Macbeth and Andronis. In Shakespeare ‘s paper by Shakespeare, Shakespeare centers around retribution and builds up the idea of death in the play. What is the awfulness of the retribution of the Elizabethan period? This is a misfortune, its thought process is retribution, and its primary plot incorporates the procedure of counter. The awfulness of vengeance in the end prompted the passing of the killer and the Avengers himself. In misfortune of retribution, we need three letters.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer