This establishes ethos and improves the quality of his arguments. In the main part of the article, the effectiveness of Big Brother technology is identified. Thus the author’s position is made even more explicit: “thanks to the State’s extensive collection of personal information, you can go along a crowded street and the camera could home in on you, zooms up, forwards and backward, keep track of you.” A female figure from BBC news clip is in accordance with John Kampfner, an opponent of CCTV cameras. It is clear from the following quote: “cameras don’t fix the human behavior. The monitor just it. ”

At one point in the text, it appears that the author has a positive approach to the advanced technology, “even if the camera does not prevent crime, his pictures helped police find the two boys, who later was convicted of murder.” With the author’s recognition of the oppositely directed point is appealing to credibility strengthened. In addition, his ability to treat the subject fairly established. The quoted passage is followed by a personal anecdote. This tells a criminal offense, that made him even more uncertain about the purpose of investing millions of pounds in security cameras. By including an own experience is pathos brought into action. Pathetic appeal puts the audience in a suitable atmosphere to cope with their feelings on the subject. It can be assumed that John Kampfner has written the article with the aim to persuade readers to confirm their exciting feel about close monitoring. The appliance of different appeal forms, quotes, and references to experts contribute to a compelling argument. It is also conceivable that the author wants to create political awareness, so that mass surveillance can be controlled in an appropriate manner.

The text manages to satisfy writer’s main intentions. On the basis of the analysis, it can be concluded that the structure of the article is coherent. This is due to its Division into three different sections: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. In addition, it can be determined that the author’s attitude towards monitoring and its dominant role in modern society is critical. This is despite the fact that he is able to illuminate the subject from differe