Making budget decisions in organizations

 

 

Discuss who is involved in making budget decisions in organizations. Based on the notes below, submit a 2 page paper that details creating a strategic approach to budgeting decisions. You can consider a specific organization that is the basis for your approach and please indicate the organization you are focusing on and if it is a public or private company.

NOTES:

Preparing a Budget Proposal (6) April 23, 2020, A & F Committee Meeting. Final revenue Projections sub-mitted to Mayor and Audit & Finance Committee. Mayor and Committee discuss budgetary emphasis and priorities, and agree on strategy to handle revenue shortfalls, request overruns, etc. (7) May 7, 2020, MRA/LGEAF Budget Hearings held as required by state law. (8) May 21, 2020, Mayor’s Budget and Budget Message presented to Council. Mayor usually delivers his proposed budget at a special called meeting late in the month. (9) June 4, 2020, First Reading of the FY 21 Budget Ordinance. (10) June 18, 2020, Second Reading of FY 21 Budget Ordinance. (11) June 20–30, 2020, Publication of FY 21 Budget Ordinance.

THE BUDGET GAME Making budgeting decisions can be a very complicated process given the number of individuals involved and their ideas and goals. In an executive budgeting system, the chief executive plays the major role in the budgeting process. That is, he/she initiates the process. However, there are several others involved in the process as well, including the budget office, legislature, and agency directors. In addition, there are some non-governmental actors that can play a role in the process such as interests’ groups and individuals (Rubin 2010). All governments however do not use an executive budgeting system. County governments tend to have administrators, auditors, or someone in the legislative branch prepare the budget. Some states have legislative budget offices that expend enormous amounts of energy and paperwork on the budget.

Sample Solution

Contained three organizations, confidential property, markets and firms, entrepreneur economies are described by confidential responsibility for merchandise, which are coordinated for use in firms, to create yield. Private enterprise is generally liable for monetary development on history’s ‘hockey stick.’ While some could contend that private enterprise goes back much farther than the sixteenth hundred years, the renowned nineteenth century market analyst Karl Marx recognized the modern insurgency of England as the beginning of private enterprise. Consequently, I will begin by involving the English Modern Unrest to act as an illustration of how free enterprise ‘makes sense of’ the ‘hockey stick’ model. He likewise perceived private enterprise as a venturing stone in the movement of humanity, as such, he connected it with improvement. There is a significant relationship between’s the increment of Gross domestic product per capita on history’s monetary hockey stick and the development of an English industrialist society. How much, be that as it may, was private enterprise a causal component of England’s initial monetary turn of events and the ‘disparate exhibition’ of economies inside England?

England’s modern and mechanical upsets happened simultaneously as fast urbanization. Countless individuals ran from distant rustic regions into large urban communities to secure better-paying positions in firms, generally working in plants. This period saw the shift from limited scope family-run organizations to firms run by proprietors and supervisors who utilized workers. This presentation of the establishment ‘firms’ into the economy, establish the groundworks for free enterprise. Simultaneously, the “mechanical change” which England experienced during the eighteenth hundred years, upset the creation cycle of overwhelmingly materials, energy, and transportation. As efficiency took off, the costs of produced products plunged, emphatically upgrading interest for English merchandise around the world. The finish of protectionism, when import charges on global labor and products safeguard homegrown enterprises from unfamiliar rivalry, transformed England into a streamlined commerce state. By the late eighteenth hundred years, this had an immense effect alone on the upwards ‘wrinkle’ on the ‘hockey stick model.’ The worth of English products rose from £15million in 1760 to £59million in 1805. Hardware, for example, the turning jenny, which empowered the client to create numerous spools of string all the while, emphatically expanded the amount of a solitary day’s result. This new innovation drove workers working for firms to ‘represent considerable authority in errands’ along the creation line. Workers who center exclusively around one undertaking produce more, these are the ‘gains from specialization.’ This really intended that from a solitary day’s worth of effort, firms not just created more confidential property for in-market deal yet in addition needed to buy more capital great to fuel their creation cycle, consequently supporting different firms. This interconnection between the three organizations, confidential property, markets, and firms recognized private enterprise. In this manner, one can affirm that an entrepreneur financial framework was active at

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.