Making vague generalizations.

 

The key to a good paper is to be specific, concrete and focused. Be sure to avoid making vague generalizations. Make sure that you back up your claims with textual support. In fact, every non-trivial claim in your paper should be accompanied by some sort of textual reference (to either primary or secondary sources). Make sure that your thesis is formulated clearly and explicitly in the first paragraph and that the body of your paper (i.e., every subsequent paragraph) directly supports that thesis. I expect to see well-written, well-organized, polished prose: coherent sentences, a natural flow from sentenced to sentence, unified paragraphs and transparent transitions from paragraph to paragraph.
Clear writing can only result from clear thinking. So, first and foremost, you must get to know the material that you chose to write about—read it and read it often, before you begin to write. I suggest that you start writing well before the deadline so that you have time to revise your ideas and edit your writing.

Although you must provide textual support of you claims (by cite page numbers), you are free to be creative in your responses. So, for instance, you are free to compose your essay in the form of a dialogue between Descartes and Socrates, Chomsky, Nagel, etc. But if you go that route, you must still offer something like a “thesis statement,” strive for clarity and provide textual support for you claims.

Sample Solution

The cult of bothsidesism kills professional journalism

False balance, also bothsidesism, is a media bias in which journalists present an issue as being more balanced between opposing viewpoints than the evidence supports. Journalists may present evidence and arguments out of proportion to the actual evidence for each side, or may omit information that would establish one side’s claims as baseless. False balance has been cited as a major cause of spreading. Professor Thomas E. Patterson, of Harvard’s Shorenstein center on media, politics and policy has studied and documented the struggles of journalists in covering politics from the Vietnam era to the present. It is possible for journalists to assess the veracity of theoretical claims without biasing themselves. This form of both-sides negativity is the most pervasive failing in journalism. Journalists should say something equally good and bad about rival sides. News that is Balanced, relevant, and trustworthy.

 

 

Rundown of “Blossoms for Algernon”

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

blossoms for algernon cover”Flowers for Algernon,” written in 1966 by Daniel Keyes, has properly gotten one of the most notable dream books in world writing. Initially composed as a short story, the tale of Charlie Gordon—the fundamental character of the book—had later been revised as a novel, which helped the writer to completely unveil characters of the primary characters and make the plot total. The epic is written as research center reports, composed by Charlie for his own benefit.

Charlie Gordon is an intellectually incapacitated multi year-old cleaner in a pastry shop. His IQ rate is 68, and along these lines, he had a troublesome youth (and as he later understood, as long as he can remember). His mom, who urgently needed him to be as brilliant as ordinary children, normally beat him at whatever point he didn’t live up to her desires, or when he showed any enthusiasm for his more youthful sister. At last, Charlie’s dad, so as to spare him from consistently expanding ambushes, had to remove the kid from home, and left him being taken care of by Mr. Donner—a bread shop proprietor.

Laborers in the pastry kitchen giggle at Charlie and menace him due to his low knowledge, yet he didn’t get it, and felt that they were chuckling at him since they like him. He goes to the Beekman College Center for Retarded Adults—his fantasy is to get more astute, which, in his comprehension, intended to have the option to peruse and compose. When he found the opportunity, in light of his uncommon will to consider, his educator Alice prescribes Charlie to experience a test mind medical procedure led by specialist Strauss and teacher Nemur: two exceptional researchers who created an approach to make individuals more intelligent through medical procedure.

The activity is fruitful, and in spite of the fact that for the principal couple of days Charlie doesn’t see any distinctions, in certainty he gets more brilliant step by step, at extraordinary rates. He consistently takes an interest in research center tests including Algernon—a shrewd mouse who had experienced a similar medical procedure; though before the activity, Charlie was not ready to try and finish it, as the time goes on, he overcomes Algernon, demonstrating bit by bit expanding results.

Charlie’s knowledge continues developing much after it arrived at the degree of a normal person. He recalls a great deal of difficult subtleties from his youth; understands that what he considered an inviting disposition was really tormenting and mortification; finding this, he understands that individuals are not all that shrewd as he accepted they were. Charlie begins to look all starry eyed at Alice, however understands that he can’t be with her. He peruses a great deal, goes to college, and soon discoveres that he is more intelligent than educators, whom he respected and nearly loved.

Simultaneously, he faces the inclination that educator Nemur and specialist Strauss don’t perceive his mankind and independence; Charlie sees that they treat him as their creation, declining to concede that the past, intellectually impeded Charlie Gordon was additionally a human person. Nemur and Strauss take Charlie to New York to a meeting for which they intend to present him and Algernon as verification

 

s of their logical hypothesis. Charlie, nonetheless, escapes from the gathering, taking Algernon with him, and covers up in a leased loft. There he meets a young lady, Fay; after a few dates, they engage in sexual relations, and start a relationship. Simultaneously, Charlie proceeds with his examinations, and continues recollecting diverse ghastly occasions from quite a while ago. In any case, at last, he understands that Fay is intruding on him from his exploration, so he chooses to come back to the lab.

There he discovers that the aftereffects of the cerebrum medical procedure he had experienced are reversible; besides, the patients debase at awful rates, and end up in a state of mind much more terrible than before the activity. Dreading the relapse, Charlie, be that as it may, acknowledges these realities, and points all his scholarly force (at this point, he is without a doubt the most insightful individual on Earth, with the IQ pace of 185) at examining this impact, which he has called “the impact of Gordon-Algernon,” on the grounds that Algernon has completely endured this impact and kicked the bucket. Charlie covered him close to the lab.

Bit by bit the negative changes become increasingly self-evident. Charlie overlooks names and occasions, and understanding the importance of books he delighted in perusing so as of late has now gotten unthinkable for him. Urgent, he begins a relationship with Alice, yet not for long—the corruption of his character makes living with him convoluted, and despite the fact that for quite a while, he stays at the scholarly degree of a normal individual, Alice is at last driven out.

Charlie winds up as a totally debased individual. From the start, he comes back to Donner’s bread shop, and afterward chooses to go to a psychological refuge. In his last report, in a P.S. he asked the individuals who were going to peruse it to put blossoms on Algernon’s

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer