Managing the poor practice

at
Categories
Tags

 

You will further expand on assignment one to critically analyse how the poor practice in health, social, and community care settings can be resolved using reliable and recent evidence.
Learning Outcomes

 

1. Describing a poor practice and its consequences (Approx. 300 words) – Describe the poor practice, its definition, and consequences. This section can be an extension of assignment one – No rephrasing is required.

2. The critical argument of evidence-based practice for resolving poor practice (Approx. 2000)
• critically analyse how the poor practice in health, social, and community care can be managed, considering three dimensions of evidence-based practice

a) patient’s values,
b) professional expertise, and
c) evidence-based research.

Please provide a minimum of one database used to find evidence of poor practice.

3. Recommendations for different involved partners as applicable (e.g., consumers, providers/professionals/practitioners, policymakers, community and government bodies), and researchers (e.g., translation of the results into practice, further future studies, change of policies and practices, training requirements) – (Approx. 400)

4. References – include three references (APA 7th). We recommend that you include at least one of these three types of research publication: a) an original quantitative research article (primary evidence) b) an original qualitative research article (primary evidence) c) a systematic review (secondary evidence, which can be any types of reviews, from scoping review to meta-analysis). Then you can use these diverse approaches to discuss evidence-based ways that the poor practice can be resolved. If this is not applicable, it is OK to choose the 3 papers from the same design. Also, please choose credible, peer-reviewed, and recent sources (last 5 yrs, if not applicable, please consider the last 10 yrs).
Notes to consider in preparation for assignment 3:
• Frame a research question based on PICO/PIO, based on the design chosen. Quantitative design  P (population or problem); I (intervention); C (comparison – this may not be applicable); O (an outcome which can be related to health, social, and community care outcomes)
• Consider a searching strategy (e.g., keywords, and linking them via Booleans) to find the most reliable sources of evidence for resolving the poor practice. The W2 unit content might be helpful for you in terms of strategy and analysing evidence. We recommend that you use a searching strategy (right keywords, and linking them via Booleans) to find the right evidence discussing the poor practice.
• Please provide the name of a (minimum of one) database used for the papers chosen, including 1-2 sentences of justification.
• Choose a practice that you can provide at least three peer-reviewed papers, as it will be the basis for your next assignments.
• If applicable, choose various types of evidence-based research including original quantitative and qualitative studies, & secondary systematic reviews.
• Please make sure to choose the 3 references carefully as they can be used for the final assignment as well – choose the most credible and recent (preferably the last 5 years, and if not applicable, the last 10 years will be acceptable). We recommend that you choose a combination of three research types: a) an original quantitative research article (primary evidence) b) an original qualitative research article (primary evidence) c) a systematic review (secondary evidence) to look at the issue from different perspectives. If you are not able to include all these 3 research variations, it is all ok, you can focus on only one or two research designs.
• Students can be flexible in the ways they write their assignment/structure headings, sub-headings, etc. For example, they can divide the EBP into 3 key sections/headings or provide intervention/strategies for improving the poor practice and then discuss the 3 dimensions under each strategy. So, they can be quite flexible, in structuring their work, as far as they cover justification around the 3 dimensions of the EBP.

Sample Solution

Poor practice takes place whenever staff fail to provide a good standard of care and support. It occurs when staff ignore the rights of service users or deny them the chance to enjoy an ordinary life. Poor practice which is allowed to continue can cause harm and can become abuse. Poor practice can happen within various health and social care settings such as hospitals. Examples of poor practices include long delays in waste; charting administration prior to med removal; re-use of single dose syringes; and routine failure to chart pain scores for as needed pain medications. Poor practice can have patient safety consequences, including increased risk of ill health, injury, and death.

calling. At the point when individuals go into social work, frequently it is on the grounds that they want to help different people on their excursion through life as we know it. While I can’t represent everybody, it is unquestionably why I picked this field. As of now, I’m an undergrad understudy seeking after a Single guys of Social Work (BSW) while at the same time acquiring further involvement with the “field” of social work through a temporary position. At its center, the “field” of social work for an understudy, is a paideia expected to adapt the understudy to the fact of what it is prefer to perform human administrations while likewise testing an understudy’s brain such that both upgrades, plans, and pushes understudies in their future social business related tries under a generalist social work practice model. To help understudies in these newly discovered encounters, a careful comprehension of a generalist practice is required, but characterizing what a generalist practice is troublesome because of the idea of the work. With that impact, a hypothetical methodology is an expected reason by which numerous social laborers and social work instructors try to advance social change. (Ashton and Frame, 2015)

The way things are, I’m an understudy for an award financed program called GCSTOP (Guilford Region’s Answer for the Narcotic Issue). GCSTOP looks to lessen the shame and damage those in dynamic illicit drug use could persevere by giving assets, trying to diminish narcotic related passings in Guilford Province. Past the circle of the scholarly world, I have gained information in the field from my past encounters working in various different networks, recuperation houses, and with people with scholarly and formative contrasts (IDD/DD) or physical and formative handicaps.

With the comprehension that one of the essential elements of social work practice is to consider the relationship of the individual and their current circumstance, the climax of my contributions has to be sure educated and formed my perspectives and points of view a social specialist. It is nothing unexpected that generalist practice abilities are necessarily connected and expand upon one another regarding and consolidation of fundamental beliefs and practice informed work.

Hypothetical Systems/Practice Models
As previously mentioned, a hypothetical methodology is expected in generalist practice while working with a wide range of substances, for example, people, families, gatherings, associations, and networks. Social Frameworks Hypothesis, comes from the longing to make sense of the interrelated variables of the moving parts in a framework that make, keep up with, as well as effect its entirety. (Ashton and Structure, 2015) Frameworks hypothesis is seen as an open hypothesis that treats individuals not as disengaged people but rather as parts of a more extensive organization like populaces, society’s, establishments, networks, etc.” “framework”. Inside this unique circumstance, a potential constraint to the actual hypothesis may be that it tends to overemphasize the “master plan” and underemphasize explicit subtleties. Scholars believe that social frameworks are open frameworks that give numerous objectives of mediation while endeavoring to work with changes inside a framework. That’s what in that, the conviction is assuming the framework is open, the framework is responsive to and impacted by outside improvement. Thought of outer variables can assist with supporting change inside those frameworks. Frameworks might be casual, similar to family or companions, formal, for example, clubs and care groups, or public, which could incorporate designs like schools and clinics. While frameworks are perplexing and can misrepresent the master plan one can’t figure out the person without checking the master plan out. D

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?