"Matt one-pager for Riehl (2006)"
Our common reading for this week is the article by Kaomea (2003 ) About post-structuralism Theory
You will engage in a close reading of your assigned article and compose a one-page document, which we call a “one-pager”.
The 'one-pager' that you'll share here should list clearly your name and the assigned article that you read. For example, I might list mine as
"Matt one-pager for Riehl (2006)"
This will make it easier for us in class as we search for what others wrote about a specific article.
Your one-pager will be comprised of the following:
1) a one-paragraph summary of the reading (in your own words);
2) what you consider three important quotes from the reading; and
3) how you think the reading relates to the “common reading” for that particular perspective. post-structuralism
In simple words this assignment need you first to read this article Kaomea (2003 ) provided for you in this order then you will need to find another article discussing post-structuralism including the above elements write one page about them.
Sample Solution
project leaders. This causes less people involved in the network chain. Yes, a closed network chain can be helpful, but it also can cause reoccurring products to be produced. Without innovation of designs, the company is destined to flatline. She needs to create and implement different levels of workers, so that more people are involved and she can start to see who would be a good fit as her successor. Right now, ultimately everyone is on the same playing field, and after a while that may cause Marimekko for fall short (Hackman 252).
Two solutions for the company include Paakkanen staying to expand the company and creating a new structure that involved hierarchy so she can train a successor. Or, the other option is Paakkanen staying and focusing on expanding the company, and not adjusting anything else. Based on the qualities of a red quadrant company, Marimekko must stay task focused and continue to have quick asset turnover (CVA 11). They current are achieving this, but they must keep it up. They also could expand internationally, since their goal is to optimize their company (CFA 1). Either choice fits the control quadrant and can benefit Marimekko.
Paakkanen choosing to stay with Marimekko to start training a successor is a strong choice for her and the company. This still gives her control over the company, since she will be personally choosing who will take over for her. She can train her successor to manage exactly how Paakkanen desires. That way, when it comes time for her to retire, she is comfortable leaving Marimekko in this person’s hands. With finding a successor she will be adding some sort of hierarchy within the group, creating even more control for her before she prepares to retire. This boosts diversification of roles in the company, which can be used as a type of reward system. If people are accomplishing their work in a successful time frame and manner, they can hold a higher role in the company. On the other hand, if Paakkanen stays to find a successor she could fall short in a few ways. Her mentality may shift to strictly focus on finding a successor and she may fall behind on her duties with subcontractors or may miss mistakes made by designers. Or, Kirsti may fail to train her successor since she is a micromanager. She may not delegate enough work and training to her successor and then she won’t have someone who is prepared to take over for her.
If Paakkanen stays with Marimekko and chooses to focus on expanding the compa