Measuring scale of variables

Alright team, this is an interesting challenge! Evaluating the impact of new customer service protocols on loyalty is crucial for any customer-centric company. Here’s how I’m thinking we could approach this, and the type of variable we’d be dealing with:

My Chosen Method: A Mixed-Methods Approach

To get a comprehensive understanding, I’d propose a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative data collection:

• Quantitative: A survey-based study administered to a sample of customers before the new protocols were fully implemented and then again to a similar (or the same, in a longitudinal design) group of customers after the implementation. This would allow us to measure changes in customer loyalty metrics.
• Qualitative: Semi-structured interviews with a smaller subset of customers (both those who show increased and decreased loyalty in the quantitative data, as well as a general sample) to delve deeper into their experiences with the new protocols and understand the reasons behind any changes in their loyalty.

The Primary Variable: Customer Loyalty (as Measured by a Loyalty Index)

Based on this approach, the primary variable we'd be working with to evaluate the impact would be customer loyalty. However, measuring something as multifaceted as loyalty isn't straightforward. We'd likely construct a Customer Loyalty Index (CLI). This index would be a composite measure derived from several survey questions designed to capture different dimensions of loyalty.  

Nature of the Variable: Approaching Interval/Ratio

The individual questions within our loyalty survey would likely utilize a Likert scale (e.g., 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree) or a numerical rating scale (e.g., 0 to 10, where 10 is extremely likely). These individual items are technically ordinal variables because the responses have a meaningful order, but the distance between the categories isn't necessarily equal.  

However, when we combine multiple of these ordinal items into a Customer Loyalty Index (CLI) using a standardized scoring method (e.g., summing the scores or averaging them), we aim to create a variable that approximates an interval or even a ratio scale.

Here’s why and how this affects our data evaluation:

• How it approaches Interval/Ratio:

  • Aiming for Equal Intervals: By carefully designing the questions and the scoring system, we try to ensure that a one-unit change in the CLI score represents a roughly similar change in the underlying level of loyalty across the entire scale. For example, the difference in loyalty between a score of 7 and 8 should ideally represent a similar magnitude of change as the difference between a 3 and a 4.
  • Potential for a Meaningful Zero (Ratio-like): While a true "zero loyalty" might be difficult to define behaviorally, a very low score on a well-constructed CLI could indicate a state close to active disloyalty or a high propensity to churn. This gives us something akin to a meaningful zero point, even if it's not an absolute absence of any connection to the brand.

• How the Nature of the Variable Affects Data Evaluation:

  • More Powerful Statistical Analyses: If we treat our CLI as approximating an interval or ratio scale, we can utilize more powerful parametric statistical tests to analyze the data. This includes:

    • Calculating Means and Standard Deviations: We can determine the average loyalty score before and after the protocol change and measure the dispersion of scores.
    • T-tests or ANOVA: To compare the mean loyalty scores of the "before" and "after" groups (or different customer segments) to see if the change is statistically significant.
    • Regression Analysis: To explore the relationship between specific aspects of the new customer service protocols (potentially measured through other survey items) and the overall loyalty score.
    • Calculating the Magnitude of Change: We can quantify the extent of the change in average loyalty scores.

  • Meaningful Comparisons: Interval/ratio data allows for more meaningful comparisons. We can say that a customer with a CLI of 80 is twice as loyal (in a relative sense, if we consider it ratio-like) as someone with a score of 40, which wouldn't be accurate with ordinal data.

  • Visualizations: We can use a wider range of visualizations like histograms, box plots, and line graphs to effectively represent the distribution and changes in loyalty scores.

  • Qualitative Data as Context: Importantly, the quantitative data from the CLI will tell us if loyalty changed, and by how much. The qualitative data from the interviews will be crucial for understanding why these changes occurred. This helps us interpret the statistical findings and gain deeper insights into the customer experience with the new protocols.

In summary, while the individual survey items might be ordinal, by constructing a Customer Loyalty Index, we aim to create a variable that approximates an interval or ratio scale. This allows us to employ more sophisticated statistical methods to evaluate the impact of the new customer service protocols on customer loyalty, providing more robust and actionable insights for the company.

Sample Solution