Medical reimbursement statistics

You are working with the chief financial officer and his team on two types of statistics related to Medicare reimbursement initiatives:

-Medicare spending per beneficiary (MSPB)
-Hospital readmission rates
You will be working with the finance team to prepare a presentation for the CEO and executive leadership team to help them understand these requirements..
Cite at least 2 scholarly reference articles or government publications that were published within the last 3-5 years.

Your presentation should address the following for both the MSPB and hospital readmission rate statistics:

Describe the Medicare program or initiative that uses the statistic.
Is it an incentive- or penalty-type program related to the rate of Medicare reimbursement?
Are the statistics and the program or initiative tied to performance, for example improving quality of care? If so, how?
Which legislation is authorizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to initiate these programs?
Define the statistic and how it is calculated.
Provide examples of these statistics from publications or government sites. For many of the CMS initiatives, data for health care institutions is made available through the CMS Hospital Compare Web site.

Sample Solution

The socio-political scene of race has changed incredibly as standardized supremacist structures have been tested, destroyed, and reconsidered by increasingly impartial and therapeutic qualities. These progressions have reached out into the administration, with an expansion in the political race and re-appointment of administrators of differing racial and ethnic personalities, including the notable appointment of Barack Obama as president. In his book Congress in Black and White, Christian Grose presents his bound together hypothesis of African American portrayal in Congress. In his work, he investigates ethnic legislative issues, and the multidimensional variables that impact authentic dynamic in Congress. He inspects how portrayal has changed with the rising of government officials and lawmakers who have a place with verifiably minimized networks, some of whom speak to greater part white regions. Eventually, he tries to inspect how dark portrayal in Congress influences minority networks.

So as to increase a total perspective on portrayal, Grose utilizes a multifaceted technique that includes breaking down and looking at lawmakers from different sorts of areas. For instance, he investigates the generally new wonder of dark lawmakers speaking to dominant part white locale so as to more readily comprehend whether dark officials’ inclinations in pushing for dark premiums are their very own direct result race or due to the race of the electorate which they speak to. His procedure permits him to dissect the impact of both the racial cosmetics of the electorate and the racial personality of lawmakers. After utilizing this technique, Grose finds that “the race of the administrator isn’t as substantively significant as the fundamental racial cosmetics of the body electorate,” and that thusly “lawmakers speaking to dark lion’s share regions will cast a ballot for enactment substantively in light of a legitimate concern for dark Americans considerably more than officials speaking to regions without a dark larger part” (16). He looks past enlightening portrayal by “investigating ongoing Congresses with dark lawmakers from both dark lion’s share and dark minority locale” to increase a progressively comprehensive and complete comprehension of dark Congressional portrayal” (Grose 17). Hence, with regards to portrayal, it is critical to take a gander at the racial cosmetics of the voting demographic alongside the race of the administrator.

Grose’s brought together hypothesis of African American portrayal in Congress