“Mental Health Disorder”


 

Choose a mental health disorder from the various disorders explored in the class/text to discuss in your paper. What might be some risk factors associated
with this disorder and how may they play a role in the development of the disorder? What might be the protective factors that could be built into someone’s
life to help ward off the development of such a disorder? What kinds of sociodemographic or cultural variances could create risk factors for this disorder?
If you want to discuss your own experiences with a diagnosis either of yourself or of someone you know to further explore the learning with this topic you
can. How might we create various levels of preventive programming that might be effective for this mental health disorder? How do you make sense of the
dimensional perspective in relation to mental health disorders and particularly, the one you’ve selected to explore more deeply here?

Sample Solution

A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning. Such features may be persistent, relapsing and remitting, or occur as a single episode (Larry, 2019). Anxiety disorders are a group of mental disorders characterized by significant feelings of anxiety and fear. Anxiety is a worry about future events, and fear is a reaction to current events. These feelings may cause physical symptoms, such as a fast heart rate and

American bondage amplified man centric society, in light of the unlimited measures of intensity that guys got during this time. Permitting a man centric culture to have full oversight over a whole race of individuals demonstrated a sad and appalling destiny for the individuals who were subjugated. This was expected to a limited extent to the distorted and evil mentalities towards sexuality during the mid nineteenth century. Minister H. Mattison directed a meeting of a previous slave by the name of Louisa Picquet. Her meeting didn’t show express insights about the sexual unfortunate behavior that occurred between female slaves and their proprietors. In any case, Louisa Picquet gave a quintessential slave story that depicted male controlled society’s most exceedingly awful characteristics as female slaves were assaulted and abused by their lords because of the infelicitous effects of a man centric culture. This paper will investigate the manners by which mid nineteenth century subjugation incited male centric society’s most noticeably terrible perspectives, just as the slanted perspectives on sexuality, as for Louisa Picquet’s story.

The first logged experience wherein Louisa Picquet encountered the sexual calling of one of her lords was when Mr. Cook bought her at just fourteen years of age. Mr. Cook professed to be sick and directed her, alongside another female slave, “to go to his room that night, and deal with him” (Picquet 4). Had Louisa not had the mental fortitude to voice her interests to Mrs. Single guy, she no doubt would have persevered through the sexual outcomes of being brought into the world a slave. Mrs. Lone wolf was a partner to Louisa as she rationalized Louisa’s nonattendance in Mr. Cook’s room. Mrs. Unhitched male’s demeanor towards the demonstration of sexual relations with slaves was objecting and defensive of Louisa. Mrs. Lone ranger protected Louisa on many occasions and sent male slaves in her place to serve Mr. Cook’s needs. In spite of the guide of Mrs. Unhitched male, Louisa suffered ramifications for her refusal to lay down with Mr. Cook. In Louisa’s meeting, she referenced twice that Mr. Cook whipped her for not visiting his bedchambers: “so he whip[ped] me around the shoulders, with the goal that I won’t overlook [to visit his room] some other time” (Picquet 6). This was a typical event in American subjugation. Be that as it may, not every single little youngster were as daring as Louisa. Various slaves inevitably yielded to their lords’ solicitations in light of the fact that the risk of being lashed or additionally rebuffed for not submitting to the white male’s solicitations was a dread that eclipsed the shocking demonstration of laying down with their lords.

Despite the fact that the white male’s sexual hunger during the mid nineteenth century was a far reaching marvel, numerous bosses discovered disgrace and shame from the demonstration of laying down with their slaves. One of Louisa’s experiences with Mr. Cook demonstrated this reality. Louisa was taking breakfast to Mr. Cook when he instructed her to close the entryway. There was no uncertainty that Mr. Cook’s aims right now to assault Louisa. Before Louisa could close the entryway, a man strolled by and glanced in the entryway, which caused Mr. Cook to modify his words saying, “what you remain there sobbing for, you dam’ fool? Go ‘long ground floor and get me some progressively salt,” to cause it to give the idea that he was reproving her as opposed to ordering her to do the inconceivable (Picquet 5). This exhibited Mr. Cook’s mentality towards sex was licentious, yet in addition despicable. Obviously, there were experts that openly admitted to sexual associations with their slaves, and even had numerous youngsters with them. Notwithstanding, the demonstration was one that indicted numerous experts for infidelity, as they had spouses and kids beside their female slaves.

This consolidated Mrs. Cook into the story as she was hitched to Mr. Cook. At the point when leasers came to take his property, Mr. Cook sent his significant other away and took his captives to Mobile, Alabama. In spite of the fact that the meeting never referenced why Mr. Cook sent his better half to live with her sister, it is sheltered to accept that he wanted his significant other to be good and gone, while he endeavored to lure his slaves. This supposition just strengthened that slave experts were embarrassed about their sexual demonstrations. Moreover, the thought strengthened the curved mentalities towards sexuality during the timespan, as white men realized that the demonstration was unsatisfactory and looked downward on by society. Despite this affirmation, they proceeded in their indulgences. Moreover, Mr. Williams, the man that bought Louisa to be his fancy woman, never conceded that he was the dad of every one of the four of her kids. On the off chance that he was ever to have organization, Mr. Williams “took them to the inn” as opposed to bringing them into his home where he submitted his double-crossing acts (Picquet 12).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.