Mentally Ill Treatment In Forensic Settings

  Identify at least two challenges related to the treatment of mentally ill offenders in a forensic setting. Explain the challenges you selected and the steps you would take to overcome them. Briefly describe the treatment approach(es) you think best addresses the challenges you identified and why. Be specific. Resources: Kratcoski, P. (2017). Correctional counseling and treatment (6th ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Chapter 6, “Mentally Ill Criminal Offenders” Chapter 9, “Community Residential Treatment and Institutional Treatment” Chapter 11, “Behavior Modification Programs Used in Corrections” Chapter 14, “Cognitive Behavioral Therapies Used in Correctional Treatment”  
This leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid the presence of guerrilla warfare which can end up in a higher death count, for example, the Vietnam War. Moreover, he argued they must be part of the army, bear arms and apply to the rules of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This suggests Frowe seeks a fair, just war between two participants avoiding non-combatant deaths, but wouldn’t this lead to higher death rate for combatants, as both sides have relatively equal chance to win since both use similar tactics? Nevertheless, arguably Frowe will argue that combatant can lawfully kill each other, showing this is just, which is also supported by Vittola, who states: ‘it is lawful to draw the sword and use it against malefactors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’ In addition, Vittola expresses the extent of military tactics used, but never reaches a conclusion whether it’s lawful or not to proceed these actions, as he constantly found a middle ground, where it can be lawful to do such things but never always (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is supported by Frowe, who measures the legitimate tactics according to proportionality and military necessity. It depends on the magnitude of how much damage done to one another, in order to judge the actions after a war. For example, one cannot simply nuke the terrorist groups throughout the middle-east, because it is not only proportional, it will damage the whole population, an unintended consequence. More importantly, the soldiers must have the right intention in what they are going to achieve, sacrificing the costs to their actions. For exam

Sample Solution

In comparison to the general population, prisoners all over the world have an increased risk of suffering from mental disorders and in many places suicide is the leading cause of death in prison. Mentally ill prisoners are prone to an increased risk of deterioration and victimization during imprisonment as well as to a very high risk of poor reintegration into the community after release. This is of particular concern as poor mental healthcare is supposed to increase the risk of re-offending in individuals with mental health disorders. The increased consultation of forensic psychiatry experts in this area reflects the interest of the relevant agencies in reducing the risk mentally disordered offenders pose to others as well as in decreasing the high suicide rate in prisons and jails.

Comply today with Compliantpapers.com, at affordable rates

Order Now