Middle range theory.

This prompts question of what fits the bill to be a soldier, and whether it is legitimate to kill each other as warriors. Soldiers are individuals who are involved straightforwardly or by implication with the conflict and it is legitimate to kill 'to protect the guiltless from hurt… rebuff criminals (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as referenced above regular citizen can't be hurt, showing warriors as the main genuine focuses on, one more state of jus in bello, as 'we may not utilize the blade against the people who have not hurt us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).' likewise, Frowe proposed warriors should be distinguished as warriors, to stay away from the presence of hit and run combat which can wind up in a higher demise count, for instance, the Vietnam War. Additionally, he contended they should be essential for the military, carry weapons and apply to the principles of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This recommends Frowe looks for a fair, simply battle between two members keeping away from non-soldier passings, yet couldn't this prompt higher demise rate for warriors, as the two sides have moderately equivalent opportunity to win since both utilize comparative strategies? By the by, seemingly Frowe will contend that warrior can legitimately kill one another, showing this is simply, which is likewise upheld by Vittola, who states: 'it is legal to draw the blade and use it against transgressors (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).' what's more, Vittola communicates the degree of military strategies utilized, yet never arrives at a resolution regardless of whether it's legitimate to continue these activities, as he continually tracked down a center ground, where it very well may be legal to do things like this however never consistently (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is upheld by Frowe, who estimates the genuine strategies as indicated by proportionality and military need. It relies upon the size of how much harm done to each other, to pass judgment on the activities after a conflict. For instance, one can't just nuke the psychological oppressor bunches all through the center east, since it isn't just relative, it will harm the entire populace, a potentially negative result. All the more critically, the officers should have the right expectation in the thing they will accomplish, forfeiting the expenses for their activities. For instance: to execute all detainees of war, they should do it for the right goal and for a worthy motivation, relative to the damage done to them. This is upheld by Vittola: 'not generally legitimate to execute all warriors… we should consider… size of the injury caused by the foe.' This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is significantly more upright than Vittola's view yet suggests similar plans: 'can't be rebuffed essentially for battling.' Thi

Sample Solution

The Middle Range Theory of Self-care of Chronic Illness proposed by Dorothea Orem is a widely accepted theory used in nursing today. This theory focuses on the individual’s ability to care for themselves and their illness based on knowledge, skills and abilities. Orem believed that nurses should focus on helping individuals to recognize the need for self-care, develop appropriate strategies of self-care management and reinforce those strategies over time (Orem, 2001). This theory has been applied in clinical practice in numerous ways. One example includes the use of patient education programs which are aimed at providing patients with information about their condition or treatments as well as teaching them how to manage their own health better (Langlais et al., 2019). These programs help build patient confidence so they can take an active role in managing their chronic illnesses; this ultimately leads to improved outcomes for both physical and mental health (Gallego et al., 2017). Another example is nurse case management which involves nurses assessing each patient’s needs individually then developing tailored care plans that address those specific needs while considering economic and cultural factors along with psychosocial aspects (Stanton & Sandhu, 2018). This approach allows nurses to be more proactive when caring for chronic illness patients thus ensuring they receive comprehensive and effective care.