Model best supports the framework of evidence-based medicine in defining and measuring quality outcomes
Which model best supports the framework of evidence-based medicine in defining and measuring quality outcomes? Why?
The model that best supports evidence-based medicine (EBM) for defining and measuring quality outcomes is the Structure-Process-Outcome (SPO) model, also known as the Donabedian model. Here's why:
- Focus on Healthcare: The SPO model was specifically designed for use in healthcare settings. It considers three key aspects: the structure (resources and capabilities), processes (how care is delivered), and outcomes (patient health impact). This aligns with EBM's emphasis on applying research findings to improve patient care.
- Integration with Research: EBM relies on strong research evidence. The SPO model facilitates the design of research within healthcare by providing a framework for identifying relevant measures across structure, process, and outcome.
- Comprehensiveness: Unlike some general quality management models, the SPO model provides a more comprehensive picture of quality. It goes beyond simply measuring processes (following guidelines) to assess the resources available (structure) and the ultimate impact on patients (outcomes).