More Than A Single Story
The theory of the looking-glass self helps explain that how you think other people view you influences your view of yourself.
In this week’s Ted Talk video, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie cautions us to not reduce ourselves or others to a “single story.” Why might it be important to see a complete picture of others and ourselves?
For your assignment, you will explore your experience with watching the video on the danger of a single story. You will consider whether you can relate to any aspect of the experiences described. You will also examine what aspects of your identity you would like people to know more about.
Click the link for Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s TED talk, The danger of a single story:
Adichie,C.N. (2009). The danger of a single story [Video].TED Conferences.
https:www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of _a_single_story
Using the theory of the looking-glass self, describe how your sense of self has been influenced by those around you.
Based on your experience from watching the video on the danger of a single story, explain whether you can relate to any aspect of what Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie shared.
Explain what aspects of your identity you would like people to know about.
Sample Solution
nd eye to all the suffering in the world. Suffering is not something perceived by the eyes, it is perceived by the heart and to ignore it would mean being heartless. It’s possible to reject the third premise if we viewed the world as neutral and indifferent to morality . If the world were devoid of emotion and feelings, only then could one deny the existence of evil. But evil is not an abstract entity. The sufferings of humans are concrete evidence to the existence of evil which makes it inhumane to reject the third premise.
C. Rejecting the Second Premise
Rejecting the second premise is therefore the only plausible way to reinforce the theistic beliefs that assert the existence of God as an all- PKG. Rejecting the second premise seeks a way to explain the co-existence of God and evil. There are two notable ways that explain this co-existence; Theodicy and Defense. Theodicy refers to explaining why an all-PKG God will allow evil to thrive. Defense is the notion of accepting that there’s no reason good enough to explain how or why the second premise can be true . To understand better, let’s consider the extinction of dinosaurs as an example. One could raise the question that if dinosaurs were created by God to inhabit the earth, then why did they go extinct? Theodicy would seek to answer this question by stating the motives God must have had for making dinosaurs go extinct. On the other hand, Defense would answer this question by asserting that there was no good reason for God to have prevented the extinction of dinosaurs. Most religions including Christianity employ theodicy and try to explain God’s motives for letting evil thrive.