Whereas a summary of a work of literature states the events (the plot) of the story, an analysis will focus on one central item within that story and explain
what it represents as well as why it is important- its significance. This semester, we have been discussing several poems, short stories, and plays. For your
literary analysis essay, choose one or two of the works we have discussed to write on (I would suggest that if you are looking at a poem, you can use two, but
for a short story or one of the plays, just focus on one). You can either write on a theme that appears in the work, the importance of a character in a work, or
the significance of a reoccurring motif or symbol. Explain why this is important to understand a deeper meaning or message within the text. Finally, apply one
of the critical theories we have discussed to provide a possible interpretation of the text.
Essay should be five full pages in length (minimum). You must use at least 3 sources-including quotes from the text(s) being analyzed, and you must also
have a “Works Cited” page. The entire paper and Works Cited page must be adequately and appropriately documented in the MLA style as stated on the
“guidelines” page.
Essay should also have a creative title centered right below the heading and right above the text of the essay.
Finally, I am adding a PDF of a passage I have my 101 classes read as we discuss Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. This was an introduction written for the
60th anniversary edition by Neil Gaiman. I am including it here because the first two pages speak to dystopian fiction in general and makes good points as to
why the author writes within that genre. I would like for you to read those first two pages, finishing up that final paragraph that goes over a few lines on the
third page, ending at “…and even she cannot see everything that her book is about.” The rest of the intro goes specifically into discussing aspect of
Fahrenheit 451 that are not relevant for our class, but those first 2 pages are. The link to the PDF is below.
https://www.stjoe.k12.in.us/ourpages/auto/2015/3/9/49008830/Bradbury%20-%20Gaiman%20Intro.pdf
The Parable of the Sower is recorded in three of the four biblical Gospels – Matthew 13:1-23, Mark 4:1-20, and Luke 8:1-15. The human heart is like receptive soil to the seed of the Word of God. Jesus used this analogy in the Parable of the Sower. The soil that the seed fell on represents four categories of hearers’ hearts, four different reactions to the Word of God: the hard heart, the shallow heart, the crowded heart, and the fruitful heart.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi