Nursing is one of the largest professions globally, and as such, nurses have the potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses
influence the politics that improve and change healthcare delivery, they ultimately advocate for their patients(Oestberg, 2013). Many opportunities
currently exist for RN’s and APRNs to actively engage in the policy review. Nurses have two different options through professional nursing associations or
by way of policy committees through their employers.
The first opportunity mentioned is by way of joining and becoming involved in professional organizations such as the American Nurse Association (ANA),
American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP), or American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). These organizations can all be utilized by
nurses to review policies. Professional associations safeguard any implemented procedure and are practical and favor nurses(ANA, n.d.). Additionally, RN’s
and APRN’s must have access to up-to-date resources to remain aware of what is happenings in healthcare policies, including within their states(Laureate
Education, 2018).
Secondly, RN’s and APRNs can actively participate in policy reviews with employers’ policy committees. Nurses can get involved in the unit council meeting
and engage in the introduction of new policies. Through this process, RN’s and APRNs can enhance the opportunities in the influencing of a policy review
by ensuring the policy promoted are effective in their workplace(Oestberg, 2013).
There are many challenges that RN’s and APRNs can encounter while participating in policy reviews in the workplace. One challenge is keeping RN’ and
APRNs are up to date on the policy changes and the trending policies pending implementation. One way to overcome this challenge is to be sure that staff
remains educated on differences and involve staff in what is working well or not so well with the new changes. Another challenge RN’s and APRNs may
face is working with individuals and lawmakers who are from different backgrounds and differ in opinions. They may be less receptive to ideas generated
by nurses simply because of nurses’ views of patients and the healthcare system as a whole(Oestberg, 2013). One way to overcome this challenge is to
learn how to speak in the lawmaker’s language and gather support from the public and your local representatives.
There are many strategies to communicate better when advocating policy reviews. One way to
Advocate for communicating the existence of opportunity is through training and good leadership. With adequate training through exemplary leadership,
nurses can better understand their roles and work environment. They care to implement new policies effectively to enhance the well-being of their
patients. Social media is another strategy to advocate the existence of opportunities. Through social media avenues such as Twitter and Facebook, nurses
can bring public awareness. Nurses can utilize these network groups to spotlight issues that are not being heard but need change.
There is a requirement for an adjustment in the psychiatric administrations for this populace. They ought to be more diverse and open in how they approach this population of people. For example, using a street-level approach. Occasionally there is a requirement for non-legislative offices, which are trusted by the homeless. Sorting out volunteers or a self-improvement groups, maybe including previous homeless people, may create a desire in the homeless to take an interest. Strategies for practice are required that give an approach to reexamine human administration practices and accomplish social, political c and group change. Changing the perspectives of how individuals see the constantly homeless mentally are required keeping in mind the end goal to realize successful projects. Creating marks of shame about mental illness appears to be broadly supported by the overall population. Corrigan (2000) states that stigmatizing mental illness doesn’t appear to be restricted don’t appear to be restricted to ignorant individuals from the overall population. Researchers have demonstrated that even prepared experts from most disciplines of mental health stereotype regarding mental illness. This should be possible by empowerment.
A test exists in changing the minds of the public about mental illness. Generally, the endeavour to create that change does not include proficient communities. There frequently needs more coordinated effort between other social associations and a failure exists within the social organization and other agencies. Corrigan (2000) Feels that an examination of these sort of world projects may challenge the research approaches common to well-controlled exploratory designs. Various approaches are needed to create the change within the human service and whole health system, to bring about a plan the meets the needs of each client individually. Walsh, Lorenzetti, St-Denis, Murwisi and Lewis (2016) feel that oppressive practices at the individual level lead the homeless to build up a question of mistrust of human and social services. To remediate this, professionals need to spend additional time with every client, connecting with and listening to t