Nursing theory research


Being able to articulate your personal worldview can help you formulate a personal philosophy of practice and enhance your influence on patients and the industry. In this assignment, you will have an opportunity to reflect on your current and future practice, and the ways worldview and nursing theory influence that practice.
Describe your personal worldview, including the religious, spiritual, and cultural elements that you think most influence your personal philosophy of practice and attitude towards patient care.
Using the Jean Watson's nursing theory that is most in line with your personal philosophy of practice and approach to patient care and discuss the similarities. Explain how the nursing theory reinforces your approach to care.
Include in your explanation a specific example of a past or current practice and how your worldview and the nursing theory could assist you in resolving this issue.
Finally, explain how your worldview and the nursing theory will assist you in further developing your future practice.

Sample Answer

A worldview or world-view is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge and point of view. A worldview can include natural philosophy; fundamental, existential, and normative postulates; or themes, values, emotions, and ethics. Worldview influences the practice of nursing as it enables the practicing nurse to be well versed with different cultures and technologies that is very imperative in the field of nursing.


The discussions about whether conscious life is a novel marvel in our universe or not has kept going decades. From one sided convictions about mankind having been made by a divinity, general assessment has for the most part moved to an increasingly adaptable, various standpoint. Since it became realized that there is life out there, specialists have for the most part bantered about the plausibility of a savvy, unsure species existing some place in space.

Some accept if outsider life exists, it is essentially preferable created over mankind. It should have a dynamic culture, quicker than-light spaceflight privileged insights, and trend setting innovations and weapons. The idea about mankind being mediocre compared to outsider species incites dread, which has been showed in mainstream society throughout the previous hundred years. Others believe that regardless of whether there is conscious life in space, it doesn't really surpass mankind as far as advancement. It is conceivable that such a race would be stuck in its own simple of our medieval age, with the most trend setting innovation in its ownership being black powder. Or then again, it could be a race of crude chasing creatures with bows and lances, living in clans, and moving around blazes.

In any case, what makes a difference is that discussions about the probability of smart extraterrestrial life moved from "whether" to "how normal?" To demonstrate this theory, let us investigate the contentions its defenders approach with.

As indicated by one ongoing investigation, risks that we are not the only one known to mankind are huge: around one of every 10 billion trillion possibilities. It might seem as though an incredibly little probability, however let us not disregard the quantity of stars in a single system that we live in, or about the quantity of cosmic systems in our neighborhood world group, or about the quantity of cosmic system bunches that exist known to mankind. Actually, considering the huge sizes of the world we live in, 10 billion trillion to one doesn't look immaterial any longer. This extent was inferred dependent on the well known Drake condition, and infers that best in class extraterrestrial human advancements may exist, however could have created and vanished previously. This is the thing that Adam Frank, the lead creator of the investigation, says: "One out of 10 billion trillion is inconceivably little. To me, this infers other clever, innovation delivering species likely have advanced before us [… ] Think of it along these lines. Prior to our outcome, you'd be viewed as a worry wart on the off chance that you envisioned the likelihood of developing a human advancement on a tenable planet were, state, one of every a trillion. In any case, even that conjecture, one possibility in a trillion, infers that what has occurred here on Earth with mankind has in reality occurred around 10 billion different occasions over enormous history, attributable to the assessed number of stars and planets known to mankind!" (IFL Science).

To be sure, we will in general think little of such apparently little probabilities, totally overlooking the way that in the sizes of universe, even one out of 10 billion trillion methods an incredibly enormous number of possibilities. This by itself could fill in as legitimate evidence for the case that humankind isn't the only one known to man, however there is a whole other world to it.

A very long while prior, researchers just anticipated there could be planets other than Earth that would have conditions appropriate for life on them to develop. Nonetheless, not very far in the past it worked out that there are exoplanets that have conditions practically like those that natural life on Earth itself appreciates. In 2014, NASA's Kepler Space Telescope identified such a planet in the supposed tenable zone of Kepler. Called Kepler-186f, this planet is accepted to be only one out of numerous other comparable planets dispersed over the universe. Indeed, a few space experts accept pretty much every star in the Milky Way has a planet circling around it. Considering the measurements referenced above, it is conceivable that a significant number of these planets are possessed, and some could be even home to insightful outsider species. Sara Seager, educator of planetary science and material science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says: "Soon sooner rather than later, individuals will have the option to highlight a star and state, 'that star has a planet like Earth'" (Huffpost).

What's more, she isn't the only one in her cases. In addition, numerous researchers are amazingly idealistic about uncovering reality, guaranteeing that in the following decades, we will know without a doubt we are not the only one in space. Charles Bolden, a previous space traveler and presently NASA head, says: "Do we accept there is life past Earth? I would dare to state that the greater part of my associates here today state it is doubtful that in the boundless immensity of the universe we people remain solitary." Kevin Hand, NASA cosmologist proposing there as of now is outsider life existing on Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, is significantly progressively explicit: "I think in the following 20 years, we will discover we are not the only one known to mankind" (CBS Connecticut).

Up until this point, mankind has no experimental proof of astute outsider life existing some place known to man. Be that as it may, there is solid scientific verification of such a likelihood, and there is the experience and information on NASA space experts who accept life outside Earth exists. Our universe is an unbelievably enormous spot. Earth is a minor hydrogen particle in the tremendous sea of room and it would be very self-important to believe that it is the main spot where the wonder of life could have risen.

Works Cited

Carpineti, Alfredo. "We Are Almost Certainly Not Alone In The Universe." IFLScience, IFLScience, 20 Mar. 2018, www.iflscience.com/space/we-are-most likely not-the only one universe/.

Doors, Sara. "NASA Makes Big Prediction About Finding Alien Life." The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 16 July 2014, www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/15/we-are-not-the only one in-universe-nasa-livable planets_n_5588455.html.

"NASA: Humans Will Prove 'We Are Not Alone In The Universe' Within 20 Years." CBS Connecticut, CBS Connecticut, 15 July 2014, connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/07/15/nasa-people will-demonstrate we-are-not-the only one known to mankind inside 20-years/.