Nutrition Analysis Project
Week 14: You will use https://cronometer.com/ (Links to an external site.) to complete another one-day food journal and record your intake. In your final reflection you will note where you made positive changes and where you have room to improve to help you optimize your nutritional status. Did you meet your goal? If not, what barriers prevented you from meeting your goal(s)? To begin part 2 of this assignment, access https://cronometer.com/ from your computer using the account you created for part 1. All your setting should have been saved in your account.
•
o
When you are finished entering your intake for your second one-day analysis, mark the day completed in the upper right-hand corner of the screen. Then take two clear screenshots, one of your Food Journal and Energy Summary and then a second screenshot of Highlighted Nutrients. For the second screenshot, the chart will fit in one screenshot if you decrease the size to 50%. Submitting clear and easy to read screenshots is critical. If your instructor cannot read the analysis reports, points will be deducted. The analysis information is only stored on the website for 7 days, so take your screenshots right after you have finished entering your intake and save the screenshots in a safe place on your computer.
significant complaints raised to his contention named the Systems Reply, Robot Reply, and Brain Simulator Reply. In the wake of tending to and cautiously examining these, I will talk about Searle's answers to these complaints and state whether I view his protests as palatable. To complete my paper, I will offer my own perspectives on why I don't view the Chinese room as a convincing motivation to surrender the possibility that cognizance is best perceived as a kind of calculation.
In his paper "Psyches, Brains and Programs," Searle examines the two limits of man-made: areas of strength for consciousness and feeble AI, and decides to focus on the previous asserting that PCs would be able or in the end will have mental capacities. Searle conjures the Chinese room psychological test to provoke the meaning areas of strength for of to at last reason that cerebrums cause brains and linguistic structure isn't comparable to semantics. He requests that perusers envision an English-talking individual unequipped with Chinese proficiency being secured in a room. Here there are three bunches of Chinese composition, content and images with English directions, separately, and a bunch of decides in English that connect the initial two clumps to produce the third. In the event that a Chinese speaker passes notes with Chinese characters under the entryway for the English-speaker to answer, they will actually want to answer with the assets gave in the room. These reactions are undefined from that of a local Chinese speaker. This situation is undifferentiated from how a PC carries out its modified roles. With the utilization of this investigation, Searle intended to demonstrate that albeit a PC might have the option to have the option to impersonate a human all around ok to breeze through the Turing Assessment, this doesn't mean the PC is keen. Searle excuses this case under the grounds that this individual is just adhering to directions and not figuring out the language.