Obesity among Libyan adults

at
Categories
Tags

 

Discuss the research approaches in these two published research papers below; and debate the strengths, weaknesses and philosophical differences by
describing, contrasting and comparing the underlying philosophical perspectives, ethical dimensions and methods of data collection and analysis in the two
published research papers.
Obesity among Libyan adults:
• Lemamsha, H., Randhawa, G., & Papadopoulos, C. (2019). Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Libyan men and women. BioMed Research
International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8531360
• Lemamsha, H., Papadopoulos, C., & Randhawa, G. (2018). Understanding the risk and protective factors associated with obesity amongst Libyan adults: a
qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5411-z
Instruction:
1)Should be word processed, using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages printed as a footer on every page. Follow Harvard
style of referencing.
2) Should have
a. Introduction which address the purpose and focus of the assignment, Explain the public health topic and provide some background information. Introduce
the main study designs that underpin the two research papers
and discuss their suitability.
b. Main body:
• Which describes, contrasts and compare the qualitative versus quantitative approaches taken in the two research papers by exploring and critically
discussing the research question
methods of data collection and analysis ethical dimensions of the research.
Also, Critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a qualitative versus a quantitative approach for addressing the chosen topic.
c. Conclusion
Provide an effective summary of the key points of the main body

 

 

Sample Solution

The two research papers by Lemamsha et al. (2018; 2019) both take a look at the prevalence of obesity among Libyan adults. The first paper, Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Libyan Men and Women (2019), is a quantitative study that uses the World Health Organization’s criteria to measure the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adult Libyans based on their body mass index (BMI). The focus was on identifying sociodemographic factors associated with increased risk such as age, sex, education level and occupation. In contrast, Understanding the Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Obesity amongst Libyan Adults: A Qualitative Study (2018) takes a qualitative approach examining both risk factors such as diet quality and physical activity levels, as well as protective factors like healthy coping skills for stress management.

Both studies employ an empirical research methodology focusing on data collection from real-world observation rather than preconceived notions or theories. While this approach has many strengths such as minimizing bias, it also comes with some limitations because researchers can only observe what is visible from the limited data points available to them. As far as ethical considerations are concerned, both studies were conducted in accordance with international guidelines pertaining to informed consent for participants. Additionally, there was an emphasis placed on ensuring confidentiality through secure storage protocols when collecting sensitive information about individuals’ health status or lifestyle habits.

In conclusion, these two studies demonstrate different approaches towards studying obesity among Libya adults; one taking a more traditional quantitative angle while the other utilizing qualitative methods to gain deeper insight into underlying causes and potential solutions. Both have their own set of strengths and weaknesses but overall they provide valuable data which can be used in future public health policy initiatives aiming to reduce rates of obesity in this region.

 

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer