I understand your reservations about a dedicated project team structure for our complex project with over 100 members. The concerns raised in the textbook about dedicated teams becoming isolated and lacking access to necessary resources are valid. However, I believe a Matrix Project Management Structure offers a more effective approach for several reasons:

Combining Strengths of Functional and Project Structures:

• A matrix structure leverages the expertise of existing functional departments (e.g., Finance, IT, Construction) while creating a dedicated project team to oversee overall coordination and communication.
• Team members retain their primary functional roles but dedicate a portion of their time to the project, ensuring access to specialized skills across the organization.

Benefits for Our Complex Project:

• Scalability: The matrix structure can easily accommodate a large team (over 100 members) by utilizing existing departmental resources. This avoids the need for a large, dedicated team that could become unwieldy.
• Increased Collaboration: Regular communication between project team members and functional departments fosters knowledge sharing and ensures everyone is aligned with project goals.
• Resource Efficiency: Existing departmental resources are utilized, reducing the need for additional hiring or training for dedicated team members.
• Enhanced Decision-Making: The matrix structure allows for input from diverse functional areas, leading to more informed and well-rounded decisions.

Addressing Sponsor’s Concerns:

The key to a successful matrix structure lies in mitigating potential drawbacks by:

• Clearly Defined Roles and Responsibilities: A detailed RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix will clearly outline who is responsible for each task, who has decision-making authority, and who needs to be consulted or informed.
• Strong Project Manager: Selecting a highly skilled and experienced project manager is crucial. They will lead the project team, facilitate communication across departments, and manage potential conflicts between functional and project priorities.
• Effective Communication: Regular project meetings, status reports, and clear communication channels will ensure everyone is informed of progress, roadblocks, and changes.

The Marriott Project as an Example:

While the full details of the Marriott project are not available, considering its scale and complexity, a matrix structure was likely employed. This structure would have facilitated collaboration between architects, engineers, construction crews, hospitality experts, and potentially government agencies, ensuring a successful outcome.

In conclusion, while both dedicated and matrix structures have their merits, for a complex project of this size, a matrix structure offers a more balanced and efficient approach. It leverages existing expertise, promotes collaboration, and ensures resource and cost effectiveness. By carefully addressing potential drawbacks through clear communication, defined roles, and strong project management, we can maximize the success of our project.